Re: Document Action: 'IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS)' to Historic RFC (draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-16.txt)

["Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <[e-mail]>]

Himanshu,

Congrats! It only took 13 years for it to become a RFC :-) Look at the
bright side of it - it happened while you are still alive :-)


Cheers,
Ali

On 11/4/14, 4:50 AM, "The IESG" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>The IESG has approved the following document:
>- 'IP-Only LAN Service (IPLS)'
>  (draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls-16.txt) as Historic RFC
>
>This document is the product of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks
>Working Group.
>
>The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Alia Atlas.
>
>A URL of this Internet Draft is:
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-ipls/
>
>
>
>
>Technical Summary:
>
>   A Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) is used to interconnect
>   systems across a wide-area or metropolitan-area network, making it
>   appear that they are on a private LAN.  The systems which are
>   interconnected may themselves be LAN switches.  If, however, they
>   are IP hosts or IP routers, certain simplifications to the operation
>   of the VPLS are possible.  We call this simplified type of VPLS an
>   "IP-only LAN Service" (IPLS).  In an IPLS, as in a VPLS, LAN
>   interfaces are run in promiscuous mode, and frames are forwarded
>   based on their destination MAC addresses.  However, the maintenance
>   of the MAC forwarding tables is done via signaling, rather than via
>   the MAC address learning procedures specified in [IEEE 802.1D].
>   This draft specifies the protocol extensions and procedures for
>   support of the IPLS service.
>
>   The original intent was to provide an alternate solution to VPLS
>   for those PE routers that were not capable of learning MAC address
>   through data plane. This became a non-issue with newer hardware.
>   The concepts put forth by this draft are still valuable and are
>   adopted in one form or other by newer work such as Ethernet VPN
>   in L2VPN Working Group and possible data center applications. At
>   this point, no further action is planned to update this document
>   and is published simply as a historic record of the ideas.
>
>Working Group Summary:
>
>   This document is an L2VPN Working Group document, and has been
>reviewed in 
>   the working group through multiple iterations of the draft.  It was
>considered to be an
>   informational draft, with the last few iterations of the draft now
>cleaning up references.
>   There was considerable debate during and after the WG last call which
>resulted in
>   new revisions being issued to resolve various comments.
>
>   After discussion with the serving AD, the document was changed to be
>Historic. Thus
>   it presents a record of the working group discussions. The revised I-D
>was also 
>   shown to the WG to check for any concerns.
>
>Document Quality:
>
>    The document provides a clear and concise set of requirements for
>IPLS - broken 
>    down into different requirement areas.  As a requirements draft there
>is no protocol 
>    implement.
>
>Personnel:
>
>     Document Shepherd: Andrew McLachlan ([e-mail])
>     Area Director: Adrian Farrel ([e-mail])
>