IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Tue, 30 September 2014 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7D91A8976 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id buctkBV4QqEj for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 029131A8972 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7827; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412109088; x=1413318688; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Y9B39HYMFpTZK6SVB3H5eAo2V9kKlJPVt8UY3UJz77o=; b=Q062SiyePoZ3UQPIgNelm5P4wty5rDxYbJxsHjJmedZIiZo+mKdoky5i zd2Dx+G/1MlFJPu3l0XaUii6gZZNpZgs+J8gyJf7uEa+CfVUbgWM/430t vaWjRtG7ygJ9nDMjvy/OsQxeuW4HbSpoyn35K5vGrdiP+6gT0sN/UdyMJ 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai8FAFUSK1StJA2E/2dsb2JhbABggkgjI1NOCQTKKodLAoEPFgF7hAMBAgQdXBIBCBEDAQIoKBEUCQgCBAENBYgqAxEBDLcfDYceARMEjW6BQ1wNBAeESwWRaoQ7hHqCEI8khkyDY2wBgUeBAgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,629,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="356502396"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2014 20:31:27 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8UKVROD018606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:31:27 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:31:27 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03
Thread-Topic: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03
Thread-Index: AQHPkMRhcjyqg7Uxb02vpeFURz4LGpv/DlUAgBuJloA=
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:31:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D0505D5C.F1105%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D03941F2.EC5AB%sajassi@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0505D5CF1105sajassiciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/uk0lIKAsH8FUIsp9DnmLdQb4Peo
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:31:34 -0000

Giles,

Just FYI – there was a poll at the IETF90 for WG adoption of this draft and there was a good consensus for it.  Here is the excerpt from l2vpn@jabber.ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@jabber.ietf.org>:



[17:22:54] <adrianfarrel> Well, we're in Ali's presentation at the moment
[17:29:37] <adrianfarrel> how many have read -- "a good amount"
[17:31:39] <adrianfarrel> wg adoption? -- "mainly the same people as have
read"

Given that there was a good consensus for it, can we initiate the WG call for it?

Thanks,
Ali

From: Cisco Employee <sajassi@cisco.com<mailto:sajassi@cisco.com>>
Date: Saturday, September 13, 2014 at 12:59 AM
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com<mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com>>
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>" <l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03


Hi Giles,

The authors of this document would like to request again for the WG adoption of this draft. A summary status of this drat was given at the last IETF. This draft has been around for a while and has already been implemented by multiple vendors.

Regards,
Ali

From: Cisco Employee <sajassi@cisco.com<mailto:sajassi@cisco.com>>
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 3:25 PM
To: "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com<mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>>, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com<mailto:giles.heron@gmail.com>>
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>" <l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>>
Subject: Request to adopt draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay-03


Giles, Nabil:

This draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay/?include_text=1  (initially called draft-sajassi-drake-l2vpn-evpn-overlay) was first published in December 2012 after the merged between two other drafts: draft-drake-nvo3-evpn-control-plane-00 and draft-sajassi-nvo3-evpn-overlay-01. After the merged, the resultant draft has gone through several iterations to incorporate WG comments. The authors believe there is good consensus for this draft and would like to request for the WG call.

Regards,
Ali

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email