Re: [L3sm] New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt

[David Ball <[e-mail]>]

Hi Qin,

On 28/08/2017 11:13, Qin Wu wrote:
>
> [DB3] I completely agree; my point is to provide some information to 
> the customer about how the service might behave if they request a 
> particular value for the MTU.
>
> [Qin-3]: I prefer to keep as it does, but if you insist, we can 
> consider to add something like this:
>
> “if the requested svc-mtu cannot be fulfilled, the management system 
> should return a error message indicating the fulfillment is not 
> possible.  How this SHOULD be communicated by the SP to the customer 
> via a mechanism that is out of scope for this document.”
>

This doesn't really address my point.  What does it mean for the 
requested svc-mtu to be fulfilled?  What behaviour is the customer 
actually requesting by setting this leaf to a particular value?


     David

-- 
David Ball
<[e-mail]>