IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L3sm] [L2sm] Followup of RFC8049bis

David Ball <daviball@cisco.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <daviball@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B6613178F for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7luxnPnV81CN for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55187131785 for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1052; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1499695294; x=1500904894; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0K2PnvnnDBMfBxSlbEX/s85fI/H3a+W1ADptqvqZMUA=; b=WFsMbrsmWiP7XYqNErkUS9DBS6WYILizq3cjrFdb0jhLeWyg4yZcSnfi 2VZOuNvW/k+Xa+aWCfAzGiYzo3iTpxJkEWOEAVNgcO2FC+jTaUEZI94UW uEkpLSiA8VfREddl7MbzYieOYmF9hWWzY8NQtS6ts3ip5QkZTfniLJmRB 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CZAgA1h2NZ/xbLJq1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBhVKDcIsMkHeWBIIRhhwCg2UWAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQEFIw8BBVEJAg4KAgIjAwICRhEGAQwGAgEBiiuNCp1jgiaLQQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBASGBC4Idg0yCDIJ5gTyGQYJhAQSJUYhbjHKUCosmhnyMaIhYJgMugQoxIQgbFUmFH4F4PzaIZgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,340,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="655992262"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2017 14:01:32 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.161] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-161.cisco.com [10.63.23.161]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6AE1Vx4027801; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:01:31 GMT
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "l3sm@ietf.org" <l3sm@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A9956B2@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <98205783-7f3c-bcf7-fecb-e755add6eb25@cisco.com> <79d0d82a-f810-0ca5-7f43-003f7f6c47a8@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A9A7FE3@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <8dd692d3-6c56-95c8-f6df-95469731d4fb@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:01:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A9A7FE3@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/3cyHdaDO3H6isxBwXt1RCyrxmCY>
Subject: Re: [L3sm] [L2sm] Followup of RFC8049bis
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:01:37 -0000

Hi Qin,

It looked to me like list-flavor was the new one and authorized/denied 
sites were the older ones that should have been deleted, but you 
probably know the history better than me here...


     David



On 10/07/2017 14:48, Qin Wu wrote:
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: David Ball [mailto:daviball@cisco.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年7月6日 20:05
> 收件人: Qin Wu; l3sm@ietf.org
> 主题: Re: [L2sm] [L3sm] Followup of RFC8049bis
>
> Hi Qin,
>
> On 05/07/2017 12:46, David Ball wrote:
>> 6. Addressed in the new draft
> This one was about the duplication of authorized/denied sites under the cloud access - I looked more carefully and I think you may have deleted the wrong ones?  The new draft now has a choice "list-flavor" that only has one case...
> [Qin]: The goal is to delete the duplicated ones, if you think we should keep list-flavor, this is fine to me and we can fix this in next version.
>
>       David
>
> --
> David Ball
> <daviball@cisco.com>
>

-- 
David Ball
<daviball@cisco.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email