[L3sm] 答复: New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 24 August 2017 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CB613296D for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 06:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKR4DFF16s4D for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282EF13295E for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DUB89281; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:54:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:54:19 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.219]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:54:06 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: l3sm <l3sm@ietf.org>, daviball <daviball@cisco.com>
CC: "stephane.litkowski" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, ke-oogaki <ke-oogaki@kddi.com>, adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [L3sm] New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTHOBzrmeGpoGPm0OXB/inaFnjWw==
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:54:05 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.599eda7d.327b23c6.1e1f@Qin-Wude-iPhone>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AA5D7A2@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <c76328ad-b71e-b2a3-92a4-b02beac2be7d@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AABA8A4@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <1823e4d3-c6ff-f3ca-d140-74fc5edba188@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AACC2FE@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <57523131-0016-069a-8663-63c3be1fac81@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AACC7B0@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <aca381d3-9dfa-bdf0-fac0-1be4e0ad6ce6@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AACC813@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>, <5f753d23-9cc1-9cf4-a587-8e250e960a57@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5f753d23-9cc1-9cf4-a587-8e250e960a57@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan599eda7d327b23c61e1fQinWudeiPhone_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.599EDA8C.00A1, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.219, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 4fad3e15d3efea492221f6ec2a787b71
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/LRJVY8P-MS069_i_5tuKVQvfDY8>
Subject: [L3sm] 答复: New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:54:24 -0000

Thanks David, I am on netconf list.:-)

Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice
发件人: daviball
收件人: Qin Wu; l3sm;
抄送: stephane.litkowski; ke-oogaki; adrian;
主题: Re: [L3sm] New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt
时间: 2017-08-24 20:29:08


On 24/08/2017 11:50, Qin Wu wrote:
[DB] Like I said, my reading of RFC6536 is that it doesn't cascade down the tree, so it needs to be put on every node.  Just putting it on the container would mean that the client couldn't create the container, but if the container already existed, they would still be able to write to everything inside it.  See RFC6536 section 3.2.3 for example.  I think the example in RFC7317 is wrong, although it is the same authors as RFC6536, which is curious.  I'll check with Martin.

[Qin]:  Yes, we need to get confirm about this, it looks to me if we apply “nacm:default-deny-write” to top level node, “nacm:default-deny-write” applicability will spread to the lower level nodes as well.
By reading RFC6536 section 3.2.3 example, I didn’t get the same understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I got a reply from Martin, he says you are right (although he agreed RFC6536 is unclear).  So, it's only needed on the container.

Thanks,

    David


--
David Ball
<daviball@cisco.com><mailto:daviball@cisco.com>