IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L3sm] [L2sm] Followup of RFC8049bis

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F96131785 for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 06:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tN1FGjUjgWCw for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 06:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7254E12EAFF for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 06:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQU30193; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:48:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:48:47 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.25]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 21:48:44 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>, "l3sm@ietf.org" <l3sm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [L2sm] [L3sm] Followup of RFC8049bis
Thread-Index: AdLz4gQczWlV+rrbRBePS8Ez8xfWvQBX1HKAADLs4QAA3YGr4A==
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:48:43 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A9A7FE3@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A9956B2@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <98205783-7f3c-bcf7-fecb-e755add6eb25@cisco.com> <79d0d82a-f810-0ca5-7f43-003f7f6c47a8@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <79d0d82a-f810-0ca5-7f43-003f7f6c47a8@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.78.218]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.596385C0.01E5, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.25, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: a8b8544ba80cf5aafd6924f07e596d40
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/LaireI8Oee6LGrtOBHd-1j-18Jg>
Subject: Re: [L3sm] [L2sm] Followup of RFC8049bis
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:48:52 -0000

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: David Ball [mailto:daviball@cisco.com] 
发送时间: 2017年7月6日 20:05
收件人: Qin Wu; l3sm@ietf.org
主题: Re: [L2sm] [L3sm] Followup of RFC8049bis

Hi Qin,

On 05/07/2017 12:46, David Ball wrote:
> 6. Addressed in the new draft

This one was about the duplication of authorized/denied sites under the cloud access - I looked more carefully and I think you may have deleted the wrong ones?  The new draft now has a choice "list-flavor" that only has one case...
[Qin]: The goal is to delete the duplicated ones, if you think we should keep list-flavor, this is fine to me and we can fix this in next version.

     David

--
David Ball
<daviball@cisco.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email