IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 02 July 2015 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41D61AC42C for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHfxqXF2KDVd for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1FE1AC434 for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15795; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1435853943; x=1437063543; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3qEh8S/Nk8nWxG8n7bILPNWNVz0+M9s7RPb7KDc8QQc=; b=TZ/bHp+9JfHPI03syFh/BDXVOaUOM0HgtPwbP5Ka/2MPn2S1KanJCcBj eCovvC9B8tTM0lP7SLWRlhsWKNHD0+aeKn9wOeQKTZXgKX3FgSIfbDMoN tgCQWTTBDuFEXDY8y/onaP2OexOvMIMbwwmBz/zv7AVSEunPn3zgTPkk9 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ChBAAVY5VV/xbLJq1bgkWBIV+/IwEJhXgCghcBAQEBAQGBC4QjAQEEAQEBGgYEBkEKARAJAg4KCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBFR8RBgEMBgIBAYgrDZh9nRmWPwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEi0qFBgYBgmiBQwEElBKLZoE6hBSCbZAOJoN8PDGCSAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,394,1432598400"; d="scan'208,217";a="547964813"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2015 16:19:01 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t62GJ0Ku000982; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:19:00 GMT
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "l3sm@ietf.org" <l3sm@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8475E8DC@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847649D0@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <5593B260.8010203@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847650A9@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <559541FF.3010200@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:51:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA847650A9@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000603040403040906030400"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/a0dM-jIxqoWltv2w93hunzxlBIs>
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:19:06 -0000

On 02/07/2015 04:27, Qin Wu wrote:
>
> Thanks Benoit for kindly reminding. It would be great that the pyang 
> tool can be also integrated into IDNits tool to check YANG document.
>
Completely agreed.
This is planned for this Hackathon.
See https://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/93hackathon
     -> *NETCONF/YANG, I2RS, OpenDaylight*

Regards, Benoit
>
> Authors, please fix these nits when submission.
>
> -Qin
>
> *������:*Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
> *����ʱ��:*2015��7��1��17:27
> *�ռ���:*Qin Wu; l3sm@ietf.org
> *����:*adrian@olddog.co.uk
> *����:*Re: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model
>
> Dear draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model authors,
>
> Note that
>
> - pyang produces:
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1>: warning: unexpected latest 
> revision "2015-04-24" in ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang>, should be 2015-06-16
>
> - "pyang --ietf" produces:
> WITH WARNINGS ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1>: warning: unexpected latest 
> revision "2015-04-24" in ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang>, should be 2015-06-16
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:804 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:804>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 72 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:852 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:852>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 71 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:879 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:879>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 71 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:884 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:884>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 71 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:901 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:901>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 72 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1024 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1024>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 71 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1258 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1258>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 71 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1271 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1271>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 71 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1404 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1404>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 73 exceeds 70 characters
> ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1410 
> <mailto:ietf-l3vpn-svc@2015-06-16.yang:1410>: warning: IETF rule (RFC 
> formatting): line length 73 exceeds 70 characters
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>     Folks,
>
>     The L3SM WG adoption call for draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model
>     has ended. The I-D is adopted as a WG document.
>
>     Just to remind that this document serves as a basis for WG to
>     continue to work on.
>
>     The authors should submit this as
>     draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model-00.
>
>     -Qin and Adrian
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     L3sm mailing list
>
>     L3sm@ietf.org <mailto:L3sm@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email