IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L3sm] [L2sm] Followup of RFC8049bis

David Ball <daviball@cisco.com> Thu, 06 July 2017 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <daviball@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E121316B9 for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bImsxrPP4s3 for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E2813155F for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=380; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1499342703; x=1500552303; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rHnN/m20ITJN3tImY0PpM5bIQRElRrg5l3LlGMeYR4c=; b=P70vrNDhz7RjAKba0jJQWcfxq5w0lcki97r5oJClcHI1h6r3JjiOX8Ht pexHrOjfZYl94TDPunOG687zF20pm85iQqg1a1QECVmyGzbO1rbQUgkFq emdCJJezI61UfJGJCcmpwh9MvpMoD5L8mCyVCnJ9MmEHzPf9lqBEt1nZw 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C4AAACJ15Z/xbLJq1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBhUyOCXOQdpYDghGGHAKDYxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQU4UQsOCi5XBgEMBgIBAYors3SLRAEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEhgyeDTIIMgnmBPIkiAQSJTIhajGmUBoF0AYkvhnqMZIhUHziBCjEhCBsVSYUfgXg/NohyAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,317,1496102400"; d="scan'208";a="654090054"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2017 12:05:01 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.161] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-161.cisco.com [10.63.23.161]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v66C50Ml031204; Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:05:00 GMT
From: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "l3sm@ietf.org" <l3sm@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A9956B2@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <98205783-7f3c-bcf7-fecb-e755add6eb25@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <79d0d82a-f810-0ca5-7f43-003f7f6c47a8@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 13:05:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98205783-7f3c-bcf7-fecb-e755add6eb25@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/v31VIL1uSS7csrLpFPzq4vQjQGI>
Subject: Re: [L3sm] [L2sm] Followup of RFC8049bis
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 12:05:04 -0000

Hi Qin,

On 05/07/2017 12:46, David Ball wrote:
> 6. Addressed in the new draft

This one was about the duplication of authorized/denied sites under the 
cloud access - I looked more carefully and I think you may have deleted 
the wrong ones?  The new draft now has a choice "list-flavor" that only 
has one case...

     David

-- 
David Ball
<daviball@cisco.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email