Re: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Tue, 28 October 2014 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851C21A912B; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wcq8fNUjicpz; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4946E1A9079; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2678; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414520738; x=1415730338; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=SS4AO38PQxwFuOYNcHf/ZQlkiMr0igLOZIif14/AmvQ=; b=LRV1CTwepPs6lIFYiom1el7TL1b8cdTCgpVDbxreykCLlbMHr+W+fcH4 0fkTiQG50gzjNyvfLO6291QBjf/WDg9A6jZli5mXutffHze9xWBw1eHMz cgfTyV1uOntiO7vHW6BQ9ZYN+nHIeYabSqQG9noW5EdmTzsT6MulUCHyT A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuEFAFXfT1StJA2E/2dsb2JhbABcgmsjVFgEgwLLMwqHTQIbgQIWAQEBAQF9hAMBAQQBAQEaFzoLEgEIGAQoBCULJQIEAQ0FCYg4AQyWUZxXBpUNAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARmBJo9IGweCcYFaBZILi12BMZEEhAGDeGyBBgc7gQMBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,804,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="364110165"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 18:25:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9SIPD0K023161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:25:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:25:12 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting
Thread-Topic: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting
Thread-Index: AQHP8sLnYDLv2+oHOUiPw0Co5slYqpxFkeMAgACETID//5vHAA==
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:25:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D07529A3.F9D76%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <544FD129.1010100@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [10.128.2.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Content-ID: <6A51300405120E40B5539DC16624EAEC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/2FRmi5s6JIKtlr665CwC0ZlMF84
Cc: L2vpn <l2vpn@ietf.org>, L3VPN <l3vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 18:31:21 -0000

Thanks Thomas. I thought PALS WG meets in PWE3 slot. Given that it meets
in L2VPN slot, we still have PWE3 slot on Friday available but I am not
sure how many people will stick around on Friday.

BTW, we have several L2VPN drafts whose WG calls got initiated several
weeks ago with a very good consensus, I would presume now that BGP-related
L2VPN work is handed off to BESS, we will discuss the next steps for these
drafts during “administrivia” slot. If so, we may need more than 10 min.

Cheers,
Ali 

On 10/28/14, 10:23 AM, "Thomas Morin" <thomas.morin@orange.com>; wrote:

>Hi Ali,
>
>The working group draft agendas where due *yesterday*, for all working
>groups, which is why Monday 27th was the deadline we indicated in our
>call for presentations.
>
>The L2VPN slot will be taken by PALS, so we don't have an option to take
>this slot to satisfy late request for meeting time.
>
>Best,
>
>-Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>2014-10-28, Ali Sajassi (sajassi):
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I wasn¹t aware yesterday¹s timeline for time slot request is a hard one
>> :-) I have a few drafts that I¹d like to discuss during the session and
>>I
>> don¹t know how many other people are in my shoes. Given that we have
>>L2VPN
>> session at our disposal, can we have another BESS session in that slot
>>if
>> we have enough materials to warrant another session?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ali
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/14, 8:21 AM, "Thomas Morin" <thomas.morin@orange.com>; wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> You can find our *draft* agenda at:
>>>     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess
>>>
>>> Note well that this agenda is subject to change.
>>> Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> -Thomas & Martin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BESS mailing list
>>> BESS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
>