IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Regarding draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-csc-01

Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com> Mon, 21 September 2009 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <erosen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FE83A6AB3; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TvEboaWQHsyJ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57653A63EC; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,424,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="59155946"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2009 15:24:08 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8LFO8h5014810; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:24:08 -0400
Received: from erosen-linux.cisco.com (erosen-linux.cisco.com [161.44.70.34]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8LFO8nh001261; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:24:08 GMT
Received: from erosen-linux (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by erosen-linux.cisco.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8LFO82N009518; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:24:08 -0400
To: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-csc-01
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:06:08 +0200. <DE337A22-B522-4349-8FE5-026700EE742E@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:24:08 -0400
Message-ID: <9517.1253546648@erosen-linux>
From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=374; t=1253546648; x=1254410648; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=erosen@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eric=20Rosen=20<erosen@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Regarding=20draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-cs c-01=20 |Sender:=20 |To:=20IJsbrand=20Wijnands=20<ice@cisco.com>; bh=nCdl4FBhYhSNmj2MdqiEgKpBUHMv+TD71kQejkbHOSw=; b=H66wJ+qmfkVdoC7959Vy1suiNQA99il/sZrbdTzlSZmnuiW1evQj4JeKym 1fJCipa2dUM0Ex3OmcXuPM6dvFMkvmxdkHrIOXqEM+p9ns3iqMlFvj2GfA+I dmhN5jQXZN;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=erosen@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, l3vpn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:23:08 -0000

Keeping all the procedures in one document, and having it presented to and
last called in both WGs, is the best procedure.  This does not violate any
IETF process rules, but it does reduce the overhead involved in preparing,
reviewing, submitting, and publishing the document.  Most importantly, it
makes it easier for future implementers to find the specifications.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status