Re: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts

[Leonard Giuliano <[e-mail]>]

I support this approach.


On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

-) This email starts a 3 week call for input, to expire October 23, 2008, for
-) the following steps:
-) 
-) 1.) To accept draft-morin-l3vpn-mvpn-considerations-03 as a working
-) group document;  and
-) 
-) 2.) To turn this document into a requirements draft, with mandatory to
-) implement features for an interoperable implementation. The authors
-) have indicated that they are willing to do this.
-) 
-) Our intention is, if this approach is accepted, to then begin WG last
-) call to submit to the IESG for publication:
-) 
-) draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast
-) draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp
-) 
-) We expect that these two documents will be submitted more or less as is
-) (i.e., certainly with any new bug fixes or other necessary corrections and
-) improvements, but without specific mandatory to implement feature
-) description in those drafts).
-) 
-) Please respond to the list with your recommendations for these two
-) courses of action.
-) 
-) Regards
-) Marshall & Danny
-)