IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Late IPR disclosure on RFC7024 - Opinions ?

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 23 October 2014 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516F31A1BDA; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytcXWgCs6qN2; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5E401A1BB3; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id tr6so1833533ieb.14 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h0riY0+E2tXERP3z49iBAzqfFS9RNCYb98zvjsAcVfs=; b=bhegkmH2yJ+9hE+xpbGGJv2hFdnPsF1KemPUxUd3k/bF9pl6yX4fICxyNKVbc7ZLpE LPnPDgAd5EfE06Dp9GUdjfnVnVS2uUjOaFJc/NGfXhOyaGUibjzUwu1ISrRp++Uv3q3r Btdzt1xoeFskDXPgiYmZ5zgtoff9OGOaTRkIU00YjFjcdEWXnpX8KUDjHQkaw9sQDZ1l a7KZnMC98V2dTidtk7lhhFy1ie0BE62BZisfaEBpUj2qBKsewz1uwMabquDO7rt0VcIk WlkSWN7gA+p6GPTaSrMP0STSdUV89v8DJDUeDiJPJpG61tTokmu5LVM0k0wHiOlUq+8t rNLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.8.1 with SMTP id n1mr485452iga.9.1414102109191; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.156.208 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <54497A88.3050808@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <544404B6.4060605@alcatel-lucent.com> <5449476C.1080307@queuefull.net> <CA+b+ER=WENsHrD8hFmoceVUd3qDNSBXE13xPCoEijtwzhJ9c8Q@mail.gmail.com> <54497A88.3050808@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:08:28 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Hoa6obqNl6_9BBJqFsW2JkBwkYY
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkLH6UDU-+sy1uEU=HQG54HscRfGUJFOfsP1xV+ZUcApw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Late IPR disclosure on RFC7024 - Opinions ?
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013cc450e5285505061e4def"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/O2Cv5lHX5JD_3aCZ3j1hg7kMtIQ
Cc: L3VPN <l3vpn@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:08:32 -0000

Ok .. I only based that statement on few recent requests from chairs asking
explicitely only authors to state the IPR knowledge of their docs.

To Tom's point if this is "ill advised and strongly discouraged" to talk
about IPR on the lists what is this thread all about then ? Why it has been
even started ? To blindly say yes or no to content of the IPR disclousure
no one posseses any knowledge of ?

r.


On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Martin Vigoureux <
martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Robert
>
> Le 23/10/2014 21:22, Robert Raszuk a écrit :
>
>> Chairs normally ask only authors for IPR statement.
>>
>
> I do not believe this is the norm.
> IETF IPR policies concern a broader set of people than "authors".
>
> -m
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email