RE: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting

"VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com> Sat, 08 November 2014 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E2C1A0066; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kSnHGAz-Irc; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66A8C1A0055; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 57290564DD449; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:23:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sA80Ne56016693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 8 Nov 2014 01:23:40 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA09.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.5.168]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 01:23:40 +0100
From: "VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN)" <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>, Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting
Thread-Topic: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting
Thread-Index: AQHP+VFDOajVGCWrR1y8pr7Q1lKzCpxUCqiAgAHXMiI=
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:23:39 +0000
Message-ID: <FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC7325F1D50F@FR712WXCHMBA09.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <545AB464.90304@alcatel-lucent.com>, <D0812DEF.FAF92%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0812DEF.FAF92%sajassi@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FEA27CFACBAF3A429E381E6FD69CDC7325F1D50FFR712WXCHMBA09z_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/VeqF5U5vE7yvAVu8awaqkY8YZ04
Cc: L2vpn <l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org>, "Giles Heron \(giheron\)" <giheron@cisco.com>, L3VPN <l3vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:23:45 -0000

Ali,

We will cover the drafts that went through L2VPN LC/adoption as part of the WG status. No a priori need to have dedicated discussion slot for these

-m
________________________________
De : Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Envoyé : 06/11/2014 14:17
À : VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN); BESS; Thomas Morin
Cc : L3VPN; L2vpn; Bitar, Nabil N; Giles Heron (giheron)
Objet : Re: [bess] Draft agenda for our IETF 91 Meeting


Hi Martin, Thomas:

Thanks for arraigning the 2nd session as this is our first IETF BESS
meeting and there are quite a few topics to discuss. BTW, I have a
question regarding the pending WG calls for L2VPN drafts. There have been
a number of WG calls for EVPN related drafts with a large number of
positive responses in support for adoption of these drafts. These calls
were initiated over 4 weeks ago and I am hoping that the L2VPN WG chairs
(Nabil and Giles) publish the results soon. I was not planning to present
any of the EVPN drafts that are in L2VPN WG calls. Would you please advise
me if there is any need to present/discuss these drafts yet again at our
BESS session(s)? Do you want to discuss this with the L2VPN WG chairs
before answering my question?

Regards,
Ali

On 11/5/14, 3:36 PM, "Martin Vigoureux"
<martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>; wrote:

>All,
>
>we have updated the agenda. We have a 2nd session on Friday and we'll be
>discussing 5 more documents at that time.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess
>
>Speakers, please start sending your slides, and please do so, whether
>you're on Wed or Fri, before Tuesday 11pm local time.
>
>Thank you
>
>M&T
>
>Le 28/10/2014 16:21, Thomas Morin a écrit :
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> You can find our *draft* agenda at:
>>     http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-bess
>>
>> Note well that this agenda is subject to change.
>> Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -Thomas & Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>BESS mailing list
>BESS@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess