Re: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts

[IJsbrand Wijnands <[e-mail]>]

Hi Thomas,

>
> For many operators its not "the vendor" but multiple vendors, and  
> that's
> why many operators (and apparently other IETF contributors too) see an
> interest in standardizing one solution, with options where needed, and
> not multiple profiles.

In your last email you say "..Misunderstanding: the draft says "MUST"  
for both PIM-based and BGP-based C-multicast routing."

How is that going to help you standardizing one solution? I also  
pointed out earlier that the Morin draft does not say which core tree  
building protocol needs to be used. This also does not help in  
getting an interoperable solution.

Thx,

Ice.