Re: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts

[David Ward <[e-mail]>]

Should #2 come before #1?

-DWard

On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:

> Support this approach.
>
> (detailed input from chairs will be welcome on the precise changes  
> that
> are needed.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Thomas
>
> Marshall Eubanks :
>> This email starts a 3 week call for input, to expire October 23,  
>> 2008,
>> for the following steps:
>>
>> 1.) To accept draft-morin-l3vpn-mvpn-considerations-03 as a working
>> group document;  and
>>
>> 2.) To turn this document into a requirements draft, with  
>> mandatory to
>> implement features for an interoperable implementation. The authors
>> have indicated that they are willing to do this.
>>
>> Our intention is, if this approach is accepted, to then begin WG last
>> call to submit to the IESG for publication:
>>
>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast
>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp
>>
>> We expect that these two documents will be submitted more or less  
>> as is
>> (i.e., certainly with any new bug fixes or other necessary  
>> corrections
>> and
>> improvements, but without specific mandatory to implement feature
>> description in those drafts).
>>
>> Please respond to the list with your recommendations for these two
>> courses of action.
>>
>> Regards
>> Marshall & Danny
>>
>