Re: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05

"Sami Boutros (sboutros)" <> Fri, 24 October 2014 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8F61A1B3A; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sedv89HMGlAz; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64701A1AF6; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=4896; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414166196; x=1415375796; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=FgEmyJj8WFtV4JkXecHNTHwI9sX8n+RlX8XXjR+loBo=; b=XsEr4rp6g7QIMiqyTsTo7owUIfpDROFJABNoMczcs3/ATqNTQAgIF7bQ b1+sZJ97f48cw3r76F9HDPQYJutHNye5vIZkU/L/OhwqqLBLb1i+SSmkD n3loU/MbrnNky4ingrwLbV0/2qmujoAuNxofMReAgvwZvoZeykoYZDqkM I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,780,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="366387127"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2014 15:56:08 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9OFu8rh032490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:56:08 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:56:08 -0500
From: "Sami Boutros (sboutros)" <>
To: Martin Vigoureux <>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:56:08 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CAB0069864FA42C3A94D2063480404A7ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:36:30 -0700
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 15:56:40 -0000




Hello Working Group,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 [1].

Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in both cases please also state the reasons).

This poll runs until November the 3rd.

Coincidentally, we remind you to check and then state on this list if you are aware, or not, of any undisclosed IPR (according to IETF IPR rules, see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) relating to draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email and state whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. The response needs to be sent to the L3VPN WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the L3VPN WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thank you