IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure

"Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" <jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1321ACFEA for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ghuFSLq8B9I9 for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8055F1ACFE9 for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 354ED3E94589F; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:48:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s9U2mZTM010826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:48:35 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.75]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:48:34 +0100
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Jorge)" <jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "EXT - thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>, L3VPN <l3vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure
Thread-Topic: Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure
Thread-Index: AQHP4jYx5x2nSJTJY0SXt7fijoPMwZxDwB0AgAOC/oCAAEpTAA==
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:48:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D076F4D1.58418%jorge.rabadan@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <5433F079.6090605@orange.com> <544E0602.1060109@orange.com> <c2eeba521c7042dcb6a7d2d2fcc6b188@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <c2eeba521c7042dcb6a7d2d2fcc6b188@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C5D13D186467CE448591A7C8C879F2F9@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/nE7RiDARmyaYyOvzlZSXFdnJYyM
Cc: "draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org>, L3VPN ADs <l3vpn-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org" <draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:48:39 -0000

I support this document for WG adoption.
Thanks.
Jorge


>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: L3VPN [mailto:l3vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin
>Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:45 AM
>To: L3VPN
>Cc: draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org; L3VPN ADs;
>draft- bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes@tools.ietf.org
>Subject: Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on
>draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf- covering-prefixes related to late IPR
>disclosure
>Hi everyone,
>We are concerned by the reduced support for this document, now that an
>IPR disclosure has been made against it ; in particular compared to
>the support expressed during the initial call for adoption.
>This call is thus extended to Nov 4th.
>Thank you for your understanding,
>-Thomas and Martin
>Tue Oct 07 2014 15:54:01 GMT+0200 (CEST), Thomas Morin:
>> Hello working group,
>>
>> At the end of July, IPR has been disclosed on both
>> draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes and
>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes, related to a patent by one
>> of the co-authors, Lucy Yong ; we consider this disclosure far from
>> satisfying considering the rules of BCP79 ("as soon as reasonably
>> possible after the Contribution is published" [1]), and in
>> particular because the information was not provided when an IPR
>> disclosure reminder question was asked by chairs to authors, during
>> the call for adoption in June.
>>
>> The WG Chairs have thus decided to take a step back and initiate a
>> new poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-03
>>[2].
>>
>> Knowing about this IPR [3], please express your opinion on whether
>> this document should be adopted or not by the Working Group. Please
>> motivate your opinion.
>>
>> Progressing this document as an L3VPN WG item is thus subject to
>> renewed WG consensus.
>>
>> Please send your comments, to the list or to the chairs, before
>> **October the 21th**.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Thomas & Martin,
>> l3vpn chairs
>>
>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp79#section-6.2.1
>> [2]
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-
>> 03 [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2397/
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email