Re: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05

"Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com> Mon, 20 October 2014 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DCA1A6FA0 for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5b_bRVNxLbD for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3271A6F9E for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1312; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413783979; x=1414993579; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OYIOYg/k/wDRXmpor8lAuq95RbO4JCQlMO4FIcMTUco=; b=UL+FDZjccUOfjF0DReYjWEiepAh/7xKRsvg0GQwkFkSEIivCmD4lH+98 zMAwfgzAqyET55wtSH3wVddwL8MPq0Pm+esd4rmduOzhGzeMH14atujDd qqLzjBcnY6udpItMVfwrQqXNF57bNSEnh1BX/eXxaDJCYfP7Q7NRB2I8E c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFADWgRFStJA2I/2dsb2JhbABbgmsjU1zME4dNAoEOFgF9hAMCBDo0BhcBCDZCJQIEARKIPwEMwBsBAQEBBgEBAQEej28RAVeESwWPZIIchEaHE4EwPIMKkSyDd2yBDzmBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,749,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="364675728"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2014 05:46:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9K5kH4l011327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:46:17 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x13.cisco.com ([fe80::5404:b599:9f57:834b]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:46:17 -0500
From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, "l3vpn@ietf.org" <l3vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll - draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05
Thread-Index: AQHP688U9f3Nj8WaeE6RYhZdpAyAspw4WSwA
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:46:17 +0000
Message-ID: <D069EF8A.F9015%sajassi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54440A63.4090404@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [10.21.90.185]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5769BAFDA95AA14EB1EE5213C10C8051@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/uIT4DzvuFKnPFDx9YqxouqnRO14
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:46:19 -0000

Support.

-Ali

On 10/19/14, 12:00 PM, "Martin Vigoureux"
<martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>; wrote:

>Hello Working Group,
>
>This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
>draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05 [1].
>
>Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
>not (in both cases please also state the reasons).
>
>This poll runs until November the 3rd.
>
>
>Coincidentally, we remind you to check and then state on this list if
>you are aware, or not, of any undisclosed IPR (according to IETF IPR
>rules, see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details) relating to
>draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>this email and state whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>IPR. The response needs to be sent to the L3VPN WG mailing list. The
>document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
>received from each author and contributor.
>
>If you are on the L3VPN WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>Thank you
>
>M&T
>
>---
>[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-05
>
>