Re: Late IPR disclosure on RFC7024 - Opinions ?

Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tmmorin.orange@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BC01A8A7E; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p5on4Vb-0a1F; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E46D1A8A08; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n12so5028171wgh.26 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aY1IaA/95f5Rd4iPe7UOH8SVBX5bKkdYi4xzIiIu30I=; b=FPxLekLk8+I8FMXp3NWk/cZRALtoEZggDv4QC3ypp3PAqcHSWes3OhjfbEKh3EArIs lPO/xNqtYuVCMlWT91sV+wEpAXW7E0E5md3fKCuMy0AJEI0BBc9C92Lxt9DDNN8gAmiR S1naF1QUkbWsJP5JEUe0eFE6wBqYAG9h3d2adsk75gELDRj3LKTAPvQWy1IzXCMSwnrm tw1aXEOF9Pw7JXoAGpPdoyPMvokJPhv9moY46luwonphGtDawIXMuq9on8LSuEZsoNTj fwQRo2e2NRVvPpVY1+0mlH8htY8FNKhz/dYo9/NYl8oYY2UdumxYdlVjzV2VCzn8GhwV shdQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.103.233 with SMTP id fz9mr19077151wib.80.1414401148984; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ARennes-652-1-155-96.w92-139.abo.wanadoo.fr. [92.139.154.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm14857317wjf.41.2014.10.27.02.12.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 02:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Thomas Morin <tmmorin.orange@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <544E0C79.3030200@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:12:25 +0100
From: Thomas Morin <thomas.morin@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: Late IPR disclosure on RFC7024 - Opinions ?
References: <544404B6.4060605@alcatel-lucent.com> <5449476C.1080307@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <5449476C.1080307@queuefull.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/vn90OlyLStHH3j2-L0O6d5RP0tI
Cc: "l3vpn@ietf.org" <l3vpn@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:12:32 -0000

Hi Benson, all,

2014-10-23, Benson Schliesser:
> Are you also aware of any options for a punitive response?

You can read RFC6701.

> I'm not sure whether this would be against the inventors, company that 
> owns the IPR, employees of that company that should have known about 
> the IPR, etc.

Well, RFC3979 is focused on individuals rather than their employers...

-Thomas