draft-...-orf-covering-prefixes re-adopted (was Re: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure)

[Thomas Morin <[e-mail]>]

Hi everyone,

This call for re-adoption is closed and we have a (not) new working 
group document.

Can authors please resubmit as draft-bess-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-00 ?

Thank you,

-Thomas



2014-10-07, Thomas Morin:
> Hello working group,
>
> At the end of July, IPR has been disclosed on both
> draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes and
> draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes, related to a patent by one of
> the co-authors, Lucy Yong ; we consider this disclosure far from
> satisfying considering the rules of BCP79 ("as soon as reasonably
> possible after the Contribution is published" [1]), and in particular
> because the information was not provided when an IPR disclosure reminder
> question was asked by chairs to authors, during the call for adoption in
> June.
>
> The WG Chairs have thus decided to take a step back and initiate a new
> poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-03 [2].
>
> Knowing about this IPR [3], please express your opinion on whether this
> document should be adopted or not by the Working Group. Please motivate
> your opinion.
>
> Progressing this document as an L3VPN WG item is thus subject to renewed
> WG consensus.
>
> Please send your comments, to the list or to the chairs, before
> **October the 21th**.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Thomas & Martin,
> l3vpn chairs
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp79#section-6.2.1
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-03
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2397/
>