[L4s-discuss] ECT(1) services w/L4S trial
rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com> Thu, 26 October 2023 17:22 UTC
Return-Path: <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
X-Original-To: l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBACC14CF1D for <l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rjmcmahon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id htrMBCzRMopT for <l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1FBC14CF17 for <l4s-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123]) by bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 438D61B203 for <l4s-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bobcat.rjmcmahon.com 438D61B203
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rjmcmahon.com; s=bobcat; t=1698340927; bh=snvJhsBpblKJm448+nWnpYtttKM0zk/c407ZLJZQqk0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=GQu90DMMGzdfoceKltUffNVzyoCyP7/a2SnR+aPTEBKxTn0orTHBCMDXs5vBngUv9 w2ayTKbv23zh+fUj/8SOnD4OAQXbFYm3BQVqe2TV0WynnbLtdP7l7ks+KfV3L/m3DP HWRb7YmPZocjYZ9H1OGpqyYbU7wW4Gvs/OIyGgY8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:22:07 -0700
From: rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: l4s-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <75bba5005d6015a8332702d29c9c281e@rjmcmahon.com>
X-Sender: rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l4s-discuss/Q9Ftc0K8btjIILWZBVa8VBKbMo4>
Subject: [L4s-discuss] ECT(1) services w/L4S trial
X-BeenThere: l4s-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput \(L4S\) " <l4s-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l4s-discuss>, <mailto:l4s-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l4s-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:l4s-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l4s-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l4s-discuss>, <mailto:l4s-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:22:11 -0000
Hi All, I'm curious about any cloud apps or services setting ECT(1) for the L4S trial, i.e. which apps are taking advantage of this low latency functionality of the network per this trial? Is there information on this that can be shared as public information? Also, I want to make sure iperf 2 has a road map for these classes of apps & services, i.e. if there are some generalized traffic patterns (like has been done for --isochronous video streaming and --burst-size for DASH. Thanks, Bob
- [L4s-discuss] ECT(1) services w/L4S trial rjmcmahon
- Re: [L4s-discuss] ECT(1) services w/L4S trial Livingood, Jason