Re: [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S) February 26-March 1, 2024 - Registration open
rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com> Fri, 26 January 2024 00:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
X-Original-To: l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8DFC14F60D for <l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:02:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rjmcmahon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQpD4HGXQCXB for <l4s-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714E1C14F5FB for <l4s-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123]) by bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3EFC31B289; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:02:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bobcat.rjmcmahon.com 3EFC31B289
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rjmcmahon.com; s=bobcat; t=1706227370; bh=kCo615l62PVwJ9wq7VNbWbH5nQ6va/JK/shwXPZXRqs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FMvZAuZr6xwXMslWViLSqjvQy3i0Q659NIveNIjwkmg1i4jWkZ9+1O2eXI4tRQ/w4 OmtCLpKxnI7Lq5LL13B1XfA3WJdirXQZUZmflLUzAHdf0XzMMA5mTUmEQWSRy9ssg/ olMqgRTsHRWcYV/ekHYQzHESgvbScAZyvuiVglAw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:02:50 -0800
From: rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: Greg White <g.white=40CableLabs.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon=40rjmcmahon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, l4s-discuss@ietf.org, Renae Cox <r.cox@cablelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <9DC989FB-BC61-4981-8ECE-80F9664A27DD@CableLabs.com>
References: <PH0PR06MB72088261CEAB09C0D2580DF1E8AAA@PH0PR06MB7208.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR06MB7208F04D5D9CA8EDDB1F31B5E8B3A@PH0PR06MB7208.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR06MB720846F8160E84955A574BDCE8BDA@PH0PR06MB7208.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR06MB72083A4AE3E0AAB80CDF08BEE8702@PH0PR06MB7208.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR06MB720843CBEF3CE5C7B153FB86E8752@PH0PR06MB7208.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9D8C8C17-500D-4F1F-A5AE-1DD69CE1F3B1@CableLabs.com> <1939c1221b68953ece71d1549155aef5@rjmcmahon.com> <9DC989FB-BC61-4981-8ECE-80F9664A27DD@CableLabs.com>
Message-ID: <e15cfd3074533d16c6a2bd1b0855865e@rjmcmahon.com>
X-Sender: rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l4s-discuss/QlubyibOSFFN3MJdp-niFRP2rhQ>
Subject: Re: [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S) February 26-March 1, 2024 - Registration open
X-BeenThere: l4s-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput \(L4S\) " <l4s-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l4s-discuss>, <mailto:l4s-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l4s-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:l4s-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l4s-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l4s-discuss>, <mailto:l4s-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:02:55 -0000
Thanks. Forgot to mention the rpi4b ethernet doesn't support hardware PTP but the rpi 5 does (per something like ptp4l or linux ptp). The Rpi5 has a MAC from Cadence with this support. Also, I haven't decoupled iperf 2 --bounceback read/write threads. I'll try to do that ahead of this in the event it's useful. I haven't updated the tcp_info stats either. That's another todo item. EPBFs for CE marks might be useful too. I try to avoid pcaps ;) Bob > I think there is a good chance on GPS. There are large windows with a > clear view of the sky in the interop lab. I will verify. > > We primarily use pcaps, capturing traffic at both ends of the link in > order to calculate and plot per-packet one way latency, ECN state > changes, QP sanctioning events, packet drops precisely, so we've not > needed clock synchronization, and this works for all application > traffic types. > > -Greg > > > > On 1/25/24, 2:39 PM, "rjmcmahon" > <rjmcmahon=40rjmcmahon.com@dmarc.ietf.org > <mailto:40rjmcmahon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > > > Any chance of having a GPS signal in the space? Or a PTP grandmaster > and > a low latency and low jitter switch for PTP multicast? This will allow > for clock sync and enable iperf 2 one way delay (OWD) metrics which can > provide insights as to what's going on. > > > Also, I'm now using rasperry pi 5's with GPS for iperf 2 development > because they are inexpensive, have hardware PTP, have a realtime clock > (RTC), have GPIO pulse per second, and outperform rpi 4's per a more > than doubling of the core frequency. A challenge is that the rpi 5 > requires a later kernel and L4S code hasn't been ported to those > versions yet. It would be good if L4S were available to this. Note: One > can use an rpi 4b in the interim for L4S testing. > https://www.l4sgear.com/ <https://www.l4sgear.com/> > > > Thanks, > Bob >> Hello! >> >> CableLabs and Kyrio are hosting an Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Loss >> Scalable Throughput (L4S) Interoperability Event, beginning Monday, >> February 26, and ending Friday, March 1, 2024 at the CableLabs office >> in Louisville, Colorado. >> >> The high-level objectives of the event are to enable application >> developers, operating system developers, transport protocol designers >> and network equipment manufacturers to perform interoperability and >> functional testing of their L4S implementations. >> >> During the “Interop·Lab” event, if we can identify additional >> interoperability features that are supported by the participants, we >> will encourage and support further interoperability testing where >> applicable. It should be noted that complete feature development is >> not required in order to participate in the event; participants are >> encouraged to participate even with limited feature functionality and >> non-final solution platforms. >> >> Participating organizations should plan to have at least one person >> attend on-site for the event. We plan to allow remote connection into >> the Interop Lab for additional persons to interact with their >> equipment. We will utilize a Slack channel to allow open discussion >> between the participants and support staff, as we work through the >> testing. >> >> Test Process and Guidelines for Participation >> Click here for Interop·Labs Process & Guidelines [1] >> >> All in-person participants and those desiring remote connectivity must >> register for the event: >> http://iplanprime.eventready.com/events/InteropL4SFeb2024 >> <http://iplanprime.eventready.com/events/InteropL4SFeb2024> [2] >> >> Registration deadline: February 21, 2024 >> >> Any questions about registration: Renae Cox r.cox@cablelabs.com >> <mailto:r.cox@cablelabs.com> >> Any questions about event: Greg White g.white@cablelabs.com >> <mailto:g.white@cablelabs.com> >> >> Thanks! >> >> CableLabs/Kyrio team >> >> >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] >> https://iplanprime.eventready.com/files/InteropL4SFeb2024/FEB%202024%20Guidelines%20Remote%20PHY%20Interop_.pdf >> <https://iplanprime.eventready.com/files/InteropL4SFeb2024/FEB%202024%20Guidelines%20Remote%20PHY%20Interop_.pdf> >> [2] http://iplanprime.eventready.com/events/InteropL4SFeb2024 >> <http://iplanprime.eventready.com/events/InteropL4SFeb2024>
- [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Loss S… Greg White
- Re: [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Lo… rjmcmahon
- Re: [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Lo… Greg White
- Re: [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Lo… rjmcmahon
- Re: [L4s-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: Interop·Labs Low… Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
- Re: [L4s-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: Interop·Labs Low… rjmcmahon
- Re: [L4s-discuss] Interop·Labs Low Latency Low Lo… Greg White