Re: [Lager] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (5167)

Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org> Thu, 16 November 2017 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <kim.davies@icann.org>
X-Original-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B89126CC4 for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFtVnHPrd0Lu for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF22120227 for <lager@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-9fc3.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [10.32.60.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C804E0D93; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 02:07:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:07:47 +0800
From: Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: asmus@unicode.org, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, shollenbeck@verisign.com, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca, phil@spodhuis.org, lager@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20171116020746.GA47541@dhcp-9fc3.meeting.ietf.org>
References: <20171024182436.0FBE8B80D3B@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171024182436.0FBE8B80D3B@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lager/-BsxdnGORZqSbryejPnGAznvJRA>
Subject: Re: [Lager] [Ext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (5167)
X-BeenThere: lager@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Label Generation Rules <lager.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lager/>
List-Post: <mailto:lager@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 02:08:00 -0000

Hello,

Quoting RFC Errata System on Tuesday October 24, 2017:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7940,
> "Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML".
> 
> Section: 4.3.7
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    Whenever an LGR depends on character properties from a given version
>    of the Unicode Standard, the version number used in creating the LGR
>    MUST be listed in the form x.y.z, where x, y, and z are positive
>    decimal integers (see [Unicode-Versions]).
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Whenever an LGR depends on character properties from a given version
>    of the Unicode Standard, the version number used in creating the LGR
>    MUST be listed in the form x.y.z, where x, y, and z are non-negative
>    decimal integers (see [Unicode-Versions]).

I agree with the interpretation that the existing text can be read that
version text such as "10.0.0" would be illegal as the zeroes are not
positive, and thus support the erratum's corrected text.

Thanks for the report!

kim