Re: [Lager] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (5986)

Asmus Freytag <asmus@unicode.org> Mon, 24 February 2020 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <asmus@unicode.org>
X-Original-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACCC3A12AE for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:30:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.116
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.116 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HteM8_fKNo1d for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:30:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0921A3A12AC for <lager@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:30:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [75.172.98.216] (helo=[192.168.1.106]) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <asmus@unicode.org>) id 1j5XI1-000CbN-9P; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:06:01 -0500
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, kim.davies@icann.org, barryleiba@computer.org, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, shollenbeck@verisign.com, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca
Cc: gimgs0@gmail.com, lager@ietf.org
References: <20200222034021.EB258F406DA@rfc-editor.org>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmus@unicode.org>
Message-ID: <8683dbe6-8e07-4783-568f-3b97b4409d15@unicode.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:05:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200222034021.EB258F406DA@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------970360940221353542E18C2B"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 464f085de979d7246f36dc87813833b26976a2cdabd2db7ad647647a8a1be72a418d855f2155c2c9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 75.172.98.216
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lager/Jf2q8grSfrDagq6c_LVCGqlHJ60>
Subject: Re: [Lager] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (5986)
X-BeenThere: lager@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Label Generation Rules <lager.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lager/>
List-Post: <mailto:lager@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:30:44 -0000

Correct, it needs to be "1+" not "1".

On 2/21/2020 7:40 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7940,
> "Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5986
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 6.3.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>     A simple rule to match a label where all characters are members of
>     some class called "preferred-codepoint":
>
>         <rule name="preferred-label">
>             <start />
>             <class by-ref="preferred-codepoint" count="1"/>
>             <end />
>         </rule>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     A simple rule to match a label where all characters are members of
>     some class called "preferred-codepoint":
>
>         <rule name="preferred-label">
>             <start />
>             <class by-ref="preferred-codepoint" count="1+"/>
>             <end />
>         </rule>
>
> Notes
> -----
> Currently the value for count is 1, which means that the rule will match a label composed of only one char.
> However, since the rule is supposed to match a label composed one or more chars, the value ofr count must be "1+" .
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7940 (draft-ietf-lager-specification-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML
> Publication Date    : August 2016
> Author(s)           : K. Davies, A. Freytag
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Label Generation Rules
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG