Re: [Lager] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (5986)
Asmus Freytag <asmus@unicode.org> Mon, 24 February 2020 00:30 UTC
Return-Path: <asmus@unicode.org>
X-Original-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACCC3A12AE for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:30:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.116
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.116 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HteM8_fKNo1d for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:30:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0921A3A12AC for <lager@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:30:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [75.172.98.216] (helo=[192.168.1.106]) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <asmus@unicode.org>) id 1j5XI1-000CbN-9P; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:06:01 -0500
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, kim.davies@icann.org, barryleiba@computer.org, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, shollenbeck@verisign.com, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca
Cc: gimgs0@gmail.com, lager@ietf.org
References: <20200222034021.EB258F406DA@rfc-editor.org>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmus@unicode.org>
Message-ID: <8683dbe6-8e07-4783-568f-3b97b4409d15@unicode.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 08:05:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200222034021.EB258F406DA@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------970360940221353542E18C2B"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 464f085de979d7246f36dc87813833b26976a2cdabd2db7ad647647a8a1be72a418d855f2155c2c9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 75.172.98.216
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lager/Jf2q8grSfrDagq6c_LVCGqlHJ60>
Subject: Re: [Lager] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (5986)
X-BeenThere: lager@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Label Generation Rules <lager.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lager/>
List-Post: <mailto:lager@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:30:44 -0000
Correct, it needs to be "1+" not "1". On 2/21/2020 7:40 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7940, > "Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5986 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> > > Section: 6.3.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > A simple rule to match a label where all characters are members of > some class called "preferred-codepoint": > > <rule name="preferred-label"> > <start /> > <class by-ref="preferred-codepoint" count="1"/> > <end /> > </rule> > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A simple rule to match a label where all characters are members of > some class called "preferred-codepoint": > > <rule name="preferred-label"> > <start /> > <class by-ref="preferred-codepoint" count="1+"/> > <end /> > </rule> > > Notes > ----- > Currently the value for count is 1, which means that the rule will match a label composed of only one char. > However, since the rule is supposed to match a label composed one or more chars, the value ofr count must be "1+" . > > Am I missing something here? > > Thanks. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7940 (draft-ietf-lager-specification-13) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML > Publication Date : August 2016 > Author(s) : K. Davies, A. Freytag > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Label Generation Rules > Area : Applications and Real-Time > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
- [Lager] [Errata Verified] RFC7940 (5986) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Lager] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7940 (… Asmus Freytag