Re: [Lager] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7940 (6105)
Asmus Freytag <asmus@unicode.org> Tue, 14 April 2020 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <asmus@unicode.org>
X-Original-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lager@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404ED3A0DF5 for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.138
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.138 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URBycZQVzwel for <lager@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AD6A3A0DF7 for <lager@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.172.116.31] (helo=[192.168.0.5]) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <asmus@unicode.org>) id 1jOReV-000EMh-52; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:55:23 -0400
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, kim.davies@icann.org, superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, shollenbeck@verisign.com, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca
Cc: michael.bauland@knipp.de, lager@ietf.org
References: <20200414124802.29E36F4071C@rfc-editor.org>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmus@unicode.org>
Message-ID: <d3ad6089-9fb4-75d1-f084-7c54e93a73af@unicode.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:55:22 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200414124802.29E36F4071C@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------721AFC83FC42EC583C5900E2"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ELNK-Trace: 464f085de979d7246f36dc87813833b26976a2cdabd2db7aa14c633a3a311d53f0849237898ef7f1350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 75.172.116.31
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lager/NsjZfYH1EsVZqs51d7DDbzOSCvQ>
Subject: Re: [Lager] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7940 (6105)
X-BeenThere: lager@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Label Generation Rules <lager.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lager/>
List-Post: <mailto:lager@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager>, <mailto:lager-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:55:38 -0000
On 4/14/2020 5:48 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7940, > "Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6105 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Michael Bauland <michael.bauland@knipp.de> > > Section: 7.2.1. > > Original Text > ------------- > A label "yy" would have the variants "xy", "yx", and "xx". Because the variant mapping from "y" to "x" is of type "allocatable" and a mapping from "y" to "y" is not defined, the labels "xy" and "yx" trigger the "any-variant" condition on the third label. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A label "yy" would have the variants "xy", "yx", and "xx". Because the variant mapping from "y" to "x" is of type "allocatable" and a mapping from "y" to "y" is not defined, the labels "xy" and "yx" trigger the "any-variant" condition on the third action. > > Notes > ----- > The "third label" at the end of the sentence makes no sense in this context, instead it should read that the condition of the "third action" is triggered. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. This should be verified. A./ > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7940 (draft-ietf-lager-specification-13) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XML > Publication Date : August 2016 > Author(s) : K. Davies, A. Freytag > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Label Generation Rules > Area : Applications and Real-Time > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > Lager mailing list > Lager@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager
- [Lager] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7940 (6105) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Lager] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7940 (… Asmus Freytag
- Re: [Lager] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7940 (… Asmus Freytag