Re: [Lake] EDHOC state machine (Was: edhoc end game: detailed plan)

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 19/12/2022 19:45, Göran Selander wrote:
> In the github master branch there is now an Appendix K ”Example
> Protocol State Machine”. People reviewing it so far thinks it looks
> good. So the new working assumption is that we keep it in, unless
> there are any objections

Ah. At this point, now that we've hit publication requested,
I think a change like this needs positive backing, given that
people expressed concerns about the possibility that state
machine text could lead to delays.

So I think the default position needs to remain that the
state machine text be omitted until we see sufficient
indication that the WG would like to include that.

(Separately, we ought not pop out a new draft unless our
AD is ok with that, but that's a different issue.)

> We would like to confirm this. Please
> review and comment:

Yes, please do comment on this.

Cheers,
S.