Re: [Lake] Lake charter call for comments

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 16 September 2019 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34735120046 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0SRwYJYZ-3N for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D86312011D for <lake@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x8GGH03f018087; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:51:20 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=/pkDhJEBxSV54205fk1vka/KUTGHi+G0p4Nw1t4J8/o=; b=YCN+rNkj4jdiP2VC6L40qfgsKrZDwK1vU6jAStdDTVTC5M+p6n2a46qqbfyybD9auWdF YQNDaaBvPbJU0hi4lsx8gG63maetqXxH2UnLJpPrLM/rB1+R9CvzprrRhMwaiLQdGy+0 g64OKIb6IISXFin+YC1eauNK59vFGNogaOmy/U3oUwTCTVA1jW5LJNUonq20QME2Lo+i m/QVIcIJnDtgkzIsmOqJE6h0mlGbTTatcOHJNEyCrnCinbZAcdOY2/6tUdrP84XL0vJ3 btPR3EXm9HasmylCnFw282JhH6dVucKFHMdk8fQrH+i7NNypd+4+afH0XSgrwHSfkLLV +Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2v0qfp2asf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:51:20 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8GGJECI002484; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:51:19 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2v0uhw05bd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:51:19 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:51:18 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:51:18 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Göran Selander <goran.selander@ericsson.com>
CC: "lake@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lake] Lake charter call for comments
Thread-Index: AQHVYt01bGGMFWuPBUOv7ydUJigIracjl5IAgAFnhID///JugIAATJiAgAmcDAD//74HgA==
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:51:17 +0000
Message-ID: <843088EC-7AC7-4283-88D2-7B9042129CB0@akamai.com>
References: <20190904045654.GY58050@kduck.mit.edu> <D1F8429D-710A-4470-A8AC-4FF70AE56F97@akamai.com> <ADC3E3F3-E45C-430F-BC04-A3EEC68E8F43@ericsson.com> <03254E1C-4067-4994-8112-2A86E52D0EA0@akamai.com> <DFA5D43B-687B-43E5-AC3B-0C7D2D2C4E8E@ericsson.com> <20190916164723.GL22210@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20190916164723.GL22210@kduck.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.21]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EA50A3040861EA4AABE34177CA828162@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-16_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=679 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909160167
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-16_07:2019-09-11,2019-09-16 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=669 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1909160167
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/4B5M_7ZGHDMneHX-4eOc_4GWKfI>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Lake charter call for comments
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:51:26 -0000

>    I could toss in a half-sentence (to crib Christian's phrasing) after the
    list of what "lightweight" refers to: "but the LAKE must still provide the
    security properties expected of IETF protocols".  How would that work?
 
That works for me.  Some might want you to add "or explain why not" at the end, but I'm not one of those. :)