Re: [Lake] Call for adoption for draft-selander-lake-edhoc - respond by June 22

Christian Amsüss <> Tue, 09 June 2020 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDAB3A0810 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjRjdWgC0UI2 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD97A3A080E for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd]) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCDE40005; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:57:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bf]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF8D7; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:57:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:829a:dddf:b208:1526]) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E2F963; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:57:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 1758269 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:57:13 -0000
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:57:13 +0200
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <>
To: =?utf-8?B?TWFsacWhYSBWdcSNaW5pxIc=?= <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Call for adoption for draft-selander-lake-edhoc - respond by June 22
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:57:21 -0000

Hello Mališa, hello LAKE group,

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 03:54:37PM +0200, Mališa Vučinić wrote:
> Please reply to this thread whether you support the adoption, and
> indicate if you are ready to review if this draft becomes a working
> group document.

I've read the -00 and skimmed -01 with special focus on the changed
sections. I especially appreciate the addtition of the repudiation
paragraph in the security considerations.

The document might need some updating with respect to the requirements
document, especially in terminology (took me a bit to find that for
"certificates by refernce", I'll need to look for 'x5u' in there), but
that puts it at a stage where I would prefer to have this as a working
group document.

I'm looking forward to extending the two OSCORE implementations (aiocoap
for large systems, libOSCORE for constrained devices) that I've written
to use this, and to experimentation with it over the various links CoAP
can be used on.

Kind regards

Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift. That
is why it is called the present.
  -- ancient saying