[Lake] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-lake-01-00: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 24 April 2023 10:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lake@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB5BC14CE4F; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 03:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: lake-chairs@ietf.org, lake@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <168233269394.64937.1848735263608755780@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 03:38:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/FOhEEGTaDR_V-gn7ZSQ0xGztVHA>
Subject: [Lake] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-lake-01-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:38:14 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lake-01-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lake/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- While I have no objection on the content (except the intended status of the work items should be specified in the charter), I find the format of the charter quite unusual. I.e., what is the purpose of the first 2 paragraphs about EDHOC ? They could probably be removed from the charter. Regards -éric
- [Lake] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Lake] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Lake] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-… Carsten Bormann