Re: [Lake] 1 week 2nd WGLC on requirements and scoping text

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Sun, 31 May 2020 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DFC3A0DA0 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 14:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-Xm1Sl1CFMp for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prometheus.amsuess.com (alt.prometheus.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:3064::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A421C3A0D9E for <lake@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd]) by prometheus.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622C54001A; Sun, 31 May 2020 23:10:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bf]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48D8106; Sun, 31 May 2020 23:10:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (089144218132.atnat0027.highway.a1.net [89.144.218.132]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95B7D182; Sun, 31 May 2020 23:10:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 874657 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 31 May 2020 21:10:18 -0000
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 23:10:18 +0200
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "lake@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200531211018.GA872308@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <3ca570db-8509-04cf-1878-291b28e00842@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3ca570db-8509-04cf-1878-291b28e00842@cs.tcd.ie>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/GP591RzEc3KGsB7gZ6TfuDIDPHM>
Subject: Re: [Lake] 1 week 2nd WGLC on requirements and scoping text
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 21:10:29 -0000

Hello Stephen, hello LAKE WG,

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:07:52PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> So, please send mail to the list saying if you are happy
> enough to proceed on this basis. If you are not, then I'd
> appreciate if you could suggest alternate text with as
> few changes as possible.

The current requirements document (even with the initial focus -- the
two projects I'll need a CoAP-transportable LAKE for would need RPKs in
one and certificates-don't-care-whether-by-reference-or-not in the
other) fit my use cases. Any document that satisfies the requirements
set out in here will work for me.

Kind regards
Christian

-- 
We are dreamers, shapers, singers, and makers.
  -- Elric