[Lake] FW: Analysis of AEAD limits on the SAAG agenda today Session 1, 13-15 UTC

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> Thu, 11 March 2021 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DDC3A1B4E for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:38:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zsTw8WI23lpJ for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:38:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46AB3A1B46 for <lake@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:38:06 -0800 (PST)
IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3A8nxxqazdGD18Bpei0bXYKrPwpr1zdoIgy1kn?= =?us-ascii?q?xilNYDZSddGVkN3rge8S0gX6hC1UVHYrn92BP6foewK5ybde544NMbC+GBT3oW?= =?us-ascii?q?fAFvAG0aLOyyDtcheVysdzzqFlGpITNPTRChxAgd/+8E2EFb8bsbq62YSln/3X?= =?us-ascii?q?wXsobSwCUc9dxiN4DgreDUFsXglBAvMCZfihz/FKrTahZngbB/7TbkUtZOTNq8?= =?us-ascii?q?bGk5jre3c9ZyIP0hWEjj+j9dfBfiSw4xYEXztDhYol6GjO+jaZ2oyftZiApSP0?= =?us-ascii?q?63Xe9NB/ltfn17J4b/Cxtg=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,240,1610406000"; d="scan'208";a="375437789"
Received: from adsl-46-161-92090.crnagora.net (HELO [192.168.100.5]) ([46.161.92.90]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2021 13:38:04 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.11.0.180909
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:38:00 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFsacWhYQ==?= =?UTF-8?B?IFZ1xI1pbmnEhw==?= <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
To: "lake@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <B41AEA3B-0186-4ED2-B04F-7B7FEAB58EDC@inria.fr>
Thread-Topic: Analysis of AEAD limits on the SAAG agenda today Session 1, 13-15 UTC
References: <A06347FA-F226-4041-A9F4-5D2791EC06DD@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <A06347FA-F226-4041-A9F4-5D2791EC06DD@ericsson.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/MonKEIw572RbuFvE7q50feYBjPY>
Subject: [Lake] FW: Analysis of AEAD limits on the SAAG agenda today Session 1, 13-15 UTC
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:38:09 -0000

FYI: SAAG session is ongoing.

Mališa

On 11/03/2021 12:40, "John Mattsson" <john.mattsson@ericsson.com> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    FYI, Analysis of AEAD limits is on the SAAG agenda today Session 1, 13-15 UTC. Starting in 20 minutes.
    
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-saag-02
    
    More of less the same presentation as I prepared for CORE, but with more time (20 minutes).
    
    I was previously requested that the part of the AEAD limit discussion for OSCORE should be done in the security area. I think the analysis presented is also relevant for non-OSCORE and non-IoT use cases.
    
    There seems to be interest to use CCM_8 with DTLS for IoT.
    https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-tls13-iot/issues/7
    
    Might also be relevant for other security protocols like SRTP, IPsec, etc.
    
    Cheers,
    John