Re: [Lake] lake draft agenda for ietf106

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> Wed, 13 November 2019 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D138120121 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:22:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPVZhbYx5l0w for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:22:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF0712003E for <lake@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:22:33 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,300,1569276000"; d="scan'208";a="411620155"
Received: from wifi-eduroam-84-220.paris.inria.fr ([128.93.84.220]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2019 15:22:05 +0100
From: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:22:04 +0100
References: <b7383561-e310-2fe5-2cdb-eba8e46991f5@cs.tcd.ie> <FD8ADB8E-72BD-446B-A074-B5EC01219B38@ericsson.com> <7036f92c-ed1a-8fec-e228-a5a73cbfb153@cs.tcd.ie>
To: "lake@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <7036f92c-ed1a-8fec-e228-a5a73cbfb153@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-Id: <90CD7C09-941C-46A7-BD16-035836665EDE@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/UwP2zBM_a65wNrDaS9yMwEIRiTk>
Subject: Re: [Lake] lake draft agenda for ietf106
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:22:36 -0000

Hi all,

We uploaded a revised agenda for the Singapore meeting based on the feedback we received on and off the mailing list. The agenda is available at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-106-lake/

See you next week!

Mališa

> On 7 Nov 2019, at 13:12, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> On 07/11/2019 11:50, John Mattsson wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, Mališa,
>> 
>> The agenda looks fine to us. 20 minutes is fine for outlining the
>> update of the requirements draft in preparation for the adoption
>> call.
> 
> Great.
> 
>> 
>> We think it is good that you bring up one of the points from
>> Karthik's mail - the use of static DH, which is in the context of the
>> credential requirements. As you have noted, we have updated EDHOC on
>> this point and it could be good to illustrate static DH with this
>> update, as Karthik did in his email.
>> 
>> The other point from Karthik - identity protection of PSK and
>> tradeoffs - should also be discussed. I'm happy to present that issue
>> and lead the discussion unless Karthik wants to take that too.
> 
> As preparation for the meeting, it'd be great if people
> (authors and others) were able to identify work items for
> the reqs draft [1] that need resolving and that would
> benefit from list and especially f2f discussion.
> 
> Maybe start a thread for each on the list so we can
> get a feel for which might make best use of our f2f
> time.
> 
> (While doing that, please keep in mind that the goal
> is not to make a requirements RFC, so we don't need
> to over-polish the text.)
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-selander-lake-reqs-03
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Thanks John
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Lake <lake-bounces@ietf.org> on
>> behalf of Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Date: Monday, 4
>> November 2019 at 07:24 To: "lake@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org> Subject:
>> [Lake] lake draft agenda for ietf106
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Mališa and I chatted about the agenda for IETF106 and came up with
>> [1] as a draft. Please feel free to suggest changes.
>> 
>> Cheers, S.
>> 
>> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-106-lake/
>> 
>> 
> <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>-- 
> Lake mailing list
> Lake@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake