Re: [Lake] Protocol name change from EDHOC to LAKE?

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 24 August 2022 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A164FC14CF13 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxjrHbLFCu_U for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C41C1524B0 for <lake@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A80E1801C; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:13:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JI2QzIgq23JA; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:13:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28D618010; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:13:31 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1661379211; bh=PPLgddxeuxJAazCv9Hr+MqqO4f6u7LADTyuY8XCfjUo=; h=From:to:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=n+w4T9ga5F8qg422PpVFVNR/7nTGbVG07jdc/IViuNx6zkcHdwp2zfQXbAdDVYFHU cjjW5WWJ17pjRqgw+wj9moQ7pCIwNxaroHgT9yG9r1FOKYX74l24lp9bt6Iuck5rYx ikkiYBrvDcIAwtePq5NDCiw/cZ339uHoijzFeqity0oH6Vk/XMNZvKqsWTd/2v5D84 UaJHshPim5+hei6F22gpi9PL2SyDRvK/223to02eCu9YIT29mYzbqpshO5f6c8bQlb MoHkobBnKik54+LMmFdrYffHnkcmSvPbKX0eYQ8UW61QZEEMAoKiKslJTklIZjsgnI ChszbXEKo1zQw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B05137; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:53:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
to: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Futf-8=3FB=3FTWFsacWhYS BWdcSNaW5pxIc=3D=3F=3D?= <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>, lake@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <22862.1661369493@localhost>
References: <20FE188B-BC22-4D68-BAAF-A3C7ABCFB422@inria.fr> <22862.1661369493@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:53:28 -0400
Message-ID: <9519.1661378008@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/gkwv9-KQg8ZESKrphkXbqmVqzr8>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Protocol name change from EDHOC to LAKE?
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:55:18 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

    > Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> wrote:
    >> The goal of this email is to seek input from the mailing list on the
    >> subject of the protocol name change from EDHOC to LAKE.

    >> For some time now, we noticed that people external to the working
    >> group have been referring to EDHOC simply as LAKE. One example is the
    >> paper at [1].

    > I don't object to changing the name.

    > But, I think the storey of the brown-M&Ms is relevant, and RFC4301 has
    > an equivalent of brown M&Ms for _IPsec_ in the Introduction.

    > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Halen#Contract_riders
    > https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232420

To complete the thought:

  If you call it "LAKE", that's a sign that you didn't actually read the
  document.