Re: [Lake] Protocol name change from EDHOC to LAKE?

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> Wed, 14 September 2022 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85020C14F718 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=inria.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNactCcL8KX3 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06FD5C14F692 for <lake@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 06:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date: references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=i4zpS64OgSGkkkkF79/lOIAPq/iDq/1+XLkl6k2XZYs=; b=jX+Vdm5OVGLNB6iL4WzP7TtXLiuCrqPaPMcU+AKCqbQ9APsIfXqeih0/ E7YkhqatH3+WeJWlpqK3m2RnYHH4lO0c9HOS+PVD+BVnYFJbF0lQvvLcQ M6guwMFvu8yAbOk/HEi8XMHd2109PKuo1WgXfPSZiVnVLbePwNwQbffW/ k=;
Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=malisa.vucinic@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,315,1654552800"; d="scan'208";a="52779447"
Received: from wifi-pro-83-103.paris.inria.fr (HELO smtpclient.apple) ([128.93.83.103]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2022 15:29:59 +0200
From: =?utf-8?B?TWFsacWhYSBWdcSNaW5pxIc=?= <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:29:58 +0200
References: <20FE188B-BC22-4D68-BAAF-A3C7ABCFB422@inria.fr>
To: lake@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20FE188B-BC22-4D68-BAAF-A3C7ABCFB422@inria.fr>
Message-Id: <656EC781-D731-4791-B5FB-26354440EE32@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/qaEat04bEWTgaHdCXiLXeNe_WsY>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Protocol name change from EDHOC to LAKE?
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 13:30:04 -0000

Dear all,

The chairs do not see consensus to rename the protocol at this point so the decision is to keep the protocol name EDHOC. 

Thanks everyone for your comments on this!

Mališa and Stephen


> On 24 Aug 2022, at 15:34, Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> The goal of this email is to seek input from the mailing list on the subject of the protocol name change from EDHOC to LAKE.
> 
> For some time now, we noticed that people external to the working group have been referring to EDHOC simply as LAKE. One example is the paper at [1].
> 
> Do you support or do you object to the protocol being renamed? The pull request has been proposed by the author team and is available at [2]. 
> 
> Please provide your comments by 9 September 2022.
> 
> Mališa and Stephen
> 
> [1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/741.pdf
> [2] https://github.com/lake-wg/edhoc/pull/333
> 
> -- 
> Lake mailing list
> Lake@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake