Re: [Lake] WGLC for draft-ietf-lake-reqs-01

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 24 February 2020 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF7E3A1176 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:17:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mx6-YGloYGsx for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5F33A1175 for <lake@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C402838980; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:16:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D62D5A4; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:17:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: "lake\@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <5a7f6cbe-4e5d-043c-d1a8-0b64633b1506@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <b7c084b0-8489-5c05-046d-33aa70c85b94@cs.tcd.ie> <5a7f6cbe-4e5d-043c-d1a8-0b64633b1506@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 25.1.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:17:15 -0500
Message-ID: <3209.1582571835@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/tWgcg_xmHhEO9_2l9MX8cNj8ssA>
Subject: Re: [Lake] WGLC for draft-ietf-lake-reqs-01
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:17:18 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
    > #5. 2.2: "the AKE must support different schemes for
    > transporting and identifying credentials, including those
    > identified in Section 2 of [I-D.ietf-cose-x509]." I seem to
    > recall there being some (possibly now expired) IPR in that
    > space. It might be worth s/including/such as/ there to give
    > some wriggle room in case one of those methods were still
    > encumbered.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-cose-x509
I can't find any IPR on this.
I prefer to use the UDF: scheme that mathmesh proposes over the x5u mechanism.

    > - 2.10: (In somewhat self-aggrandising mode:-) a reference
    > to RFC8376 might provide some more useful background here.

    > - refs: the URL for the PDF referenced by [LwM2M] is an
    > http-schemed URL. Better to use https.

    > - refs: [FairHair] - the https URL here generates a cert
    > error (wrong name in some URL shortener or something)

It's moved to:
     https://openconnectivity.org/developer/specifications/fairhair

seems an odd thing for fairhair to do.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-