Re: [Last-Call] [dispatch] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ACE3A39A5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:30:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vSbK5qITPUx; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6953A2AF8; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:22:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFvO4-1kXxrV1SeU-00EvZf; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:21:51 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:21:50 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org" <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1621999862.13960.1605115310791@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <903208889.160640.1599644667966@email.ionos.com>
References: <159893058662.23844.17177953972396775177@ietfa.amsl.com> <1066090379.166058.1598958286518@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJJaUDysmd+MFtQY1EfxjhVTq9sxEbQa6tf6Wy8g_3ERiA@mail.gmail.com> <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com> <808181205.131590.1599043971572@email.ionos.com> <CA+9kkMAwvmu5FM=R=_z37ekybHycjrz4RyNZBb3ThRFwU3XQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <d56b7ab8-52f7-c0bc-3c68-d7893c903be2@gmail.com> <916398430.283512.1599128074641@email.ionos.com> <9C86A277-47EA-47D8-8B09-1236BFDD1530@nostrum.com> <80653043.461504.1599148969376@email.ionos.com> <1541395114.285974.1599580192738@email.ionos.com> <78D63CAD-1598-4973-9393-368E708BD354@akamai.com> <93E4AA86-9CF4-4635-9E95-2A40C62E026B@nostrum.com> <903208889.160640.1599644667966@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:H08hwNuEoB+cjOiKS7/DFfkWZxsgB/Y+zPvonMDY/Pr4Guxb0vg MseueeQxBRc8Xfgcsf+geSDTBy6Bms4LZskKyCpl+jbIY8hsMrnDDzbGYtbpMCWRcJBZQCm cUG9lME4rVxdLnwgZ0GgN+li8QXgNTXcKVxOI4F6D1vPQcF55J1N+wW9QlOBpwH5CAGHoOw KumKv0CWqTQ0IXDZtXlzA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vp3yn7+U/qQ=:gYtNOhSRIc6KamKObtEtmy txj1teM/Y4wuvSL+AWT9XYc5v9aBKHuIMP1ABkuw+KsnXstkqeTkXZ1KupU/N+uOjHisXQedZ GdfUVJoSxafZBTlRrKQBytwzItXP/U6otP2If65SKHzXFQqdtoNNNIDgapNewbPTNTrTGgepm N+82jcb3fz+8ddbPLZvIcEhbtxn2d9DujeH43WUPy58+eMkCw74Wkwq96vK1qbengf4bIJYcK 1OAUtUHyepsBgaiw2qkAyjZ0qx6eUWn3M2hflTr9toNTRp1b6AqSlA/gts17nZfeE96ag0spH CVt7mXN+s8ouMfIf6X3ZrTqEv5Oba8P1FtuO+VEidpBNvIsSw0PYTDtwnuQFYcT7giN15482e t59D02mgXcAGSxYXnlcGQJP71YgC00udw5bTS2Mh8Mk912/ZHw/ufKrUJak/TSICgkm1jU/UH 2gh3AcjJdriYVp6q/XP+9/9q4rJM003L0TkOUzyqBuTe+tKjBH0c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/0-4zl4iwWN6uXMB3oca2zDk2H78>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [dispatch] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:30:32 -0000

> On 09/09/2020 5:44 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm not sure what was meant by Rich's comment about IANA being hired staff but, when it comes to the DDDS,
> you really can't get any more expert in an review without them. They already:
> 
> 1. manage the zone
> 2. manage the name registration
> 3. manage the submission procedure
> 4. manage the list for vetting registrations in the zone
> 5. have an engineering team to report any technical problems
> 
> 
> 
> > On 09/08/2020 1:37 PM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > On Sep 8, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> > > Does anyone else feel this way? I am opposed.
> > > 
> > > It *appears* that this change removes the requirement for proper URI’s, or at least moves the responsibility to IANA, which is hired staff.
> > 
> > 
> > I continue to oppose any approach that removes the requirement that the URI scheme itself go through an expert review. It seems appropriate that such review happen at the time of scheme registration (as opposed to the time of requesting inclusion in uri.arpa). The requirement for permanent registration of the scheme gives us that.
> > 
> > There may be other ways to achieve the same thing, but they would almost certain require more complicated specification changes than simply saying “The scheme MUST be permanently registered”.
> > 
> > Ben.
> > -- last-call mailing list last-call@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call