Re: [Last-Call] [dispatch] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B283A19B5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:30:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rf4reFf4eZxI; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB853A15F7; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:21:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGkbP-1kYn4c1dJ3-00DYSR; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:21:39 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:21:38 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1760923241.13949.1605115298919@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1541395114.285974.1599580192738@email.ionos.com>
References: <159893058662.23844.17177953972396775177@ietfa.amsl.com> <1066090379.166058.1598958286518@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJJaUDysmd+MFtQY1EfxjhVTq9sxEbQa6tf6Wy8g_3ERiA@mail.gmail.com> <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com> <808181205.131590.1599043971572@email.ionos.com> <CA+9kkMAwvmu5FM=R=_z37ekybHycjrz4RyNZBb3ThRFwU3XQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <d56b7ab8-52f7-c0bc-3c68-d7893c903be2@gmail.com> <916398430.283512.1599128074641@email.ionos.com> <9C86A277-47EA-47D8-8B09-1236BFDD1530@nostrum.com> <80653043.461504.1599148969376@email.ionos.com> <1541395114.285974.1599580192738@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HUNMSEX55B6Sp7FdlFEmyHPntPKNWfG2tPRN018iUBWMI7fHec5 57jpOO87VoEeHJyUtQTLO5YjSVecB3HovzSvXLM0cVd5IG92zM+C6lBeNalwr03QN4VK79y C+Qe10T5WPGOITEWl2TvA73eS+4gg2UEawXxdGqso6hR60WAd1Wvl2Y2gKIG7ikoDTnt3dF xyusXjWCYPzFiqMjJBfJQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:bZEQfmBKIDc=:KkRa6cH7oLuBlojWFqIPej j0xNHhvkYk8gb27L1gn9QwINkNXoyYrL3qu50NCaOJstzAcfiBaG5hqskzqgUTLDb8M7L/Ltw 9e+74hDKS3i7pmAA8lyo+aKyCpPcIcJ593Nrt2HmS5c/Bh1Vo+Fv15JyjQJ83KP75MdNJFfrL b0eL+0EiWm+e9GS/6kVFgTZxCDYbqTfOdLzUQMPbST0P+gnvaZnBWBHdmkWkdhqIhTDxuFTuF z7DjXqlSQlamkroCiq0aluVwvtfnaYEfOFBYNhAjzU7STfiLi3fvRMgi67k2afhdZCMOQgrIJ Ur2fB9XmMLK6aDAvcCMQt0+zpntOuSbHrA4EB+gjRZNQJO6tZ/l8j3Wkps1tL+9nHHksUS1c6 VaP8fwkSBp8yVAlCOQDncjMUV9mgd4NtxIqkVSqnfs1FTFZiXSU3L8zioV9kgBq82wwJRimQi H8eN+pgs0g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/0UX_T4E0_yFjVs7ihzqGzfPrfUM>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [dispatch] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:30:10 -0000

> On 09/08/2020 11:49 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> How about:
> 
> 2. Updated Requirements
> This document removes and replaces the normative requirements from sections 3.1.1 
> and section 3.1.2 of RFC3405 with:
> 
> The registration of a NAPTR record for a URI scheme MUST NOT precede registration of that scheme. IANA will review the request against for
> 
> 1. correctness and technical soundness (eg. valid databases, service parameters etc.) and
> 2. consistency with the published URI resolution application specification, and
> 3. to ensure that the NAPTR record for a DNS-based URI does not delegate resolution of the URI to a party other than the holder of the DNS name. This last rule is to insure that a given URI's resolution hint doesn't hijack (inadvertently or otherwise) network traffic for a given domain.
> 
> 3. IANA Considerations 
> 
> This update does not change the IANA submission procedure in Section 5 of RFC 3405.
>