IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Tue, 25 October 2022 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F90C14CF05 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9k9tB5Drby5z for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F31C14CF1C for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kitty.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0RKB0HWEQP2CUB@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for last-call@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:06:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.153] (kitty.dhcp.bergandi.net [10.0.42.19]) by kitty.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0RKB003JXP2BIR@kitty.bergandi.net> for last-call@ietf.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from customer.lsancax1.pop.starlinkisp.net ([98.97.56.69] EXTERNAL) (EHLO [192.168.1.153]) with TLS/SSL by kitty.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.19]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:12 -0700
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:06:11 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
In-reply-to: <5C89E6B9-02CC-4318-A6B3-BCEC64B3A8E1@nohats.ca>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Message-id: <299a2059-a85e-f99f-643e-7207b2050fdf@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=kitty.bergandi.net, send-ip=98.97.56.69)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: customer.lsancax1.pop.starlinkisp.net [98.97.56.69] (EHLO [192.168.1.153])
References: <1659579803.1584473.1666713109917@email.ionos.com> <5C89E6B9-02CC-4318-A6B3-BCEC64B3A8E1@nohats.ca>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [221003a] (kitty.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/0s5rFCTSeLRHMEl0mqK-nhXu_n8>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:06:16 -0000


On 10/25/22 10:07 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2022, at 12:05, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/25/2022 9:34 AM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
>>>> interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
>>>> suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the IETF.
>>> It is a mistake that we will correct.
>>>
>>
>> Since it's a list we are all on, I would like to suggest an alternative name.  How about Master-list?
> I consider this email inappropriate and unprofessional. It was a follow up to another one of your emails that as similarly inappropriate and unprofessional.
>
> Additionally, you keep misusing the last-call list for off-topic messages.
>
> I ask that the moderators evaluate these messages.
>
> Paul

   You know what's inappropriate and unprofessional? An IESG member
abusing his authority to chill speech that he doesn't like.

   Dan.

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

v2.13.0 | Report a Bug | By Email