IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 25 January 2020 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EB31200E9; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:54:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxbv5_aYtY3s; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:54:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A66A12001B; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:54:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id e7so3928708iof.11; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:54:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=trC2rqu1gr9sGWqaOrK66h1xuk1nuY/eoLhyh/7AV+I=; b=FJCL3nLs0OUeGOimzEAq9MG2wEJtCNQqw4nECgwNL//htelr82wadaJyXhzlz3BOK1 IkTHdl0HaSXGDyUmx0X1hYBOCOMx96OiSDsia/tK2t5y/tB2yX75VZlQxgf+/xFmdWrp +gB3GElea8qy3yMJGIQ/EdPXFb+arOmojcer7smRJD3nKP5UMZDsL5siPWbFTf5+GRAZ j6Rnjt4oZk1ZtNAk1xHhiCfF4pXd3VxplH2zo9Co8Tw8wURPGN5nAFcVKxY3s60qMNro xAQK0nnN4xGxsxjHqied4oFXoseXdcMRPKnpuYEF9wH15wCHAAZA9N/+GQDI89lYLTEg 4Q0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=trC2rqu1gr9sGWqaOrK66h1xuk1nuY/eoLhyh/7AV+I=; b=QTQF0gPTCG/6MLQ7xeCJRGZwfIbMQPgBf4s6JEfyrYe7eAmXlmKp3BLibtqiy8ePck s1YWwBRAqXpgNOyLiGS/mAHbzTcBEICeqN6lw1hR+zLkcAyo+UwOsI6jRU/vlRYR6lVC 2wwoocMogWHcf8bpVBUpsHTeIyGRoGwmol9jMw5dQDpNbl729jncP9V8gf44vEKOpARC YsXJ6N0+oxYsVSR1xzB9F9UZdaMVfUuf5K7t8TLjO4ir17Ay5K5uxV0NjTksk1s8mBex HcUDtL/9/65JrYlHBUjGsHSmePM8yMCKC2EfBd/MeJJbql5VHKsLxqryC9sUTOEW1mkG c5Dw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/16gqpYS/1ZvsaIIKG4DlD2E0wyWC/BWpFjvhLdhnsS6Z8M4r ilXOFl7gAD1jnGTzdrIrT91irm/4xaKQWmZnS2ks04Cj8g8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzcKoC3Y9nYWwbCZXrPC5d1DTdn9unst3zL1OpNPiRB6gc3SMESYhszjuQ4yNowvpQhDmrxfaFB8RgJy5DMWXE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:21a:: with SMTP id e26mr4961899jaq.53.1579917279456; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:54:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sy5-ejdjw5zgZgiF1hSyuiAErmas-dbWFmx1b+1vftT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOMVYpEYaEUzYsa0ApDfGtA6oD5P67A40=HQVBN+yTuKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz7vihWaoeG8H11JzQ5YqrbYLPLneuY3PD4syMYEaKQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMeuPQnUtOvxxscN2Si+s5ntx11RE-fRQararL+ePmDXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMeuPQnUtOvxxscN2Si+s5ntx11RE-fRQararL+ePmDXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:54:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzWpbJksfAD5bEQ5q+OApVBgMU5PZzniyYncex8R70Jeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003774ad059ced28a2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/1s4ahNskyuYtOsPO642_yaIRKds>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 01:54:43 -0000

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:49 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>> Maybe I'm confused about this, or shouldn't have used the term "discuss
>> criteria" (though [0] contained the term, as well as the section on
>> "Document Classes Reviewed by the IESG").
>>
>
> All of these document classes apply only to the IETF stream.
>

Then where do "Document Actions (from RFC-Editor)" originate?

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email