IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 09 March 2022 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521F93A11DF for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:15:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vPNZ_Wwgjw5s for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:15:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89213A11EC for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 229CE32H010803; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:15:10 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Jz3/cy3fB3htfoDRJy/4Zs/h2yBaSnWAzU/qttz63r0=; b=RfELr1PyS3XmUX/6KLqj7pj01ZY4G5mpK/AaMQ1f82JziEs8/QanF1xsiATbrne3RIzS 6rJM6UGuuVL6P4nxt7SicO8u/eqBItb4EzO+LyQyrbW82TZeLGopw9JCTVXQTLBDsisY sk7a7uncc3csR2R3S9p30Pe2X8bIXA1w8UiIBZ6Qi8CsHeX+YSzjvy4RdlxEvIyGx4sH ajSQEhuYNz5JoQzsR8b9Zz++7tEcpMn/uzhoNRphtMRU42NeS8SU/nAWHaHs27dGg+e3 137j+jfG2wAVit7cbXeIAMpH8TNf1aVjtdNObEw253Vod3cRus/FiyTDz/wTFQcDGP6B BA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3enqenk00q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:15:09 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 229EC3kS015089; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:15:07 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.24]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3em43378pw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Mar 2022 09:15:07 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.120) by usma1ex-dag4mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.922.20; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:15:07 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.28; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:15:06 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.028; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:15:05 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "garyillyes@google.com" <garyillyes@google.com>, "m.koster@greenhills.co.uk" <m.koster@greenhills.co.uk>, "henner@google.com" <henner@google.com>, "lizzi@google.com" <lizzi@google.com>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: AQHYLMpSOJX633bVn0a2FFfHU631eqyppBYAgABMOACAAAcuAIALrnoAgACAvwCAAAmigP//rYiAgADRsICAABYWAIAAca+A
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:15:05 +0000
Message-ID: <5DCC145C-D887-4184-B8F5-3C00563C620A@akamai.com>
References: <20220228222932.825F33844270@ary.qy> <245C65D2-EC38-4C49-9CA0-3DD687CB37DA@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMAnmoJ0n3mPscZvc6kbyOZjQU78vb+iA0Pw5Qq=_kKZEw@mail.gmail.com> <ee8c0615-9207-cf7a-b1a0-905f33062e7a@taugh.com> <CA+9kkMBn-jJbwKjOdOpLL3PFS0REVUBUoSa+2MD0NxnvttHCcg@mail.gmail.com> <91329874-9301-40EC-8155-FBFE55DB89E4@akamai.com> <618c8f70-3d09-fe09-6088-597b2b63655e@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <3efab652-be64-e179-b387-0468a2da9f1c@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <3efab652-be64-e179-b387-0468a2da9f1c@taugh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22030601
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <64367FE2A59F654E97BECFB14757F691@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.816 definitions=2022-03-09_05:2022-03-03, 2022-03-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=829 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203090078
X-Proofpoint-GUID: fEPyqDQUU-m-z8nagdN-U7iexaTW2I9L
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: fEPyqDQUU-m-z8nagdN-U7iexaTW2I9L
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-09_05,2022-03-09_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=801 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203090079
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/1wYWxjQGK1x2rOOf17c6MF58tCg>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:15:44 -0000

    > I don't like to guess, 

Let's not guess, let's ask the authors directly.  

> Can someone – probably one of the authors, not Ted – why they feel it is necessary to not allow derivative works?
 
> In the past there have been many RFC’s that documented existing cryptographic algorithms: Blake2, ChaCha/Poly, etc. None of them say no derivatives.

Why do you want no-derived-changes?  Given that the IETF almost never does this, I would expect this to be a hard requirement to justify.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email