IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 05 October 2022 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBF7C14F740; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0arztyAgWQF; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADEFFC14F745; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 2956lGwF083028 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 01:47:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1664952438; bh=fbau7lP6qvEhy9CBC1CbQsvc45uRgqs50rqVIKiSb/w=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=U2VXl6FGHbCb7yKxFF0vJbPoN/4tgAkPebJ3nVuUkpjZ6ux3JsUDQPZi9t4JZ/oHJ RXCJKbOf8ruC5c7GMNszFDqnJYdKeg+1O+8ZExMlVUqnpixR3Ly+SJvRMUEAteuRFp FG5QYW3enFXWsztxwVAEyYkCPSFMRCTjCTJSij/g=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253] claimed to be smtpclient.apple
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail-337CB3E2-4DF8-48DE-B963-2F7329914DE0"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 01:47:10 -0500
Message-Id: <9DE7A8CA-CB36-4189-AE8D-54D6F6A2D7D8@nostrum.com>
References: <b12dbc2b-fc4e-0337-9573-734b978561ee@lear.ch>
Cc: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <b12dbc2b-fc4e-0337-9573-734b978561ee@lear.ch>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G82)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/1y8i3Iw0regotZz7bfTpAeK2lQU>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 06:47:29 -0000

Let’s be fair. Lloyd was responding to Dan, not the BCP 83 last call. Yeah, the response could have been more diplomatic, but this subthread isn’t an inherent part of the BCP 83 process, and could have just as easily arisen on any *other* mailing list Dan was posting in.

/a 

> On Oct 5, 2022, at 01:21, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05.10.22 08:03, Lloyd W wrote:
>>>> On 5 Oct 2022, at 16:39, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Histrionics are not helpful right here and right now.
>> ...says man with long recorded history of resorting to histrionics.
> 
> And this is my problem with BCP 83.  We should be evaluating the messages, not the man.
> 
> Eliot
> 
> -- 
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email