IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-16 secdir review

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 26 March 2023 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC97C14CE27; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 03:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rilY_1eO1HPp; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 090C0C14CF1C; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id h12-20020a17090aea8c00b0023d1311fab3so5821476pjz.1; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679824970; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tRvzVeSKwqx4iuYF0hNMxEIbruSrjrr9i0bPpPyxc28=; b=nEMYe3LTJtIXo2Cu0nKi5fItTPUeooLK4Q4gvEHvtpwSsFoVmx/ZQZulXwqOoCADrj fB4HJxHrGvwb+EwOFsChOJC+wn0eImPFBtDQCD0FWYB3MQvaCyUnzEVUFBSehDrRy1QY t3whd8lLhAqPtlOwSfItpHajXCd1B/N9XUWdn1WqeMqxILiLQHLKrmU4+Bb9iVBpliq9 zBg2v/ADvLS3Lj4Klf5uJgKFh5xiTFU979xDWL9/JRrgQbKwyN+D8t4P0Qp7YBKB1uIb p1O0MwP0I959fwv1TM51oHz3n8XnX9tAFIVI2uH7zPC/wFJ0U+ADIy59/WqUNfyRvL20 1w8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679824970; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tRvzVeSKwqx4iuYF0hNMxEIbruSrjrr9i0bPpPyxc28=; b=wWDP1BtZJFifVB1mt8JQHRiAjdBWKWNPKmR6kog7zdBPJcor5O3FprGBe4bgXwRF/e iv8e+KV/GPcYDUdV1/2vNLOkLOSLZDVPnJCR8k4qLxdEP/MXlFJMIu29XiRazad+RQi9 ghn/sp5vQSOf62Y7ouJQAtrj5OlYbslcXLqQWJItlcPLKSYaVwdP9ciJWligTFYFxtQe F0+3TMSHm46AMEmUbeP+CHVEM0zPcTMQDynVbTk3dsIKV7c/KoM+8qW3CeZnjt46o5jl 8qcXf7jfKCq9lG9wrpUql55gzXnt9Sl3dPDbS8JZKdNH5+qiw+QbPWOZ7JvUK2CwBZU8 Qc7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cpwSOTmLMYDf1SPTMosYp+9KSRSnr+cyfK3Ihfjn7OOg+dKbG7 M/Z9HV7KQ65uSK/1QC/zLEDqNQWt/xtlVkZr7R90moAPXROK9A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YYV76gwUTLhhM6BY4NoBzfUzqlmqy1cLW6A8TgfRTbqv/Qo5+J8C8hZ1IdBr1hyER7u5EX3yPSx3z4afhN5J0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bb85:b0:1a0:535b:22d9 with SMTP id m5-20020a170902bb8500b001a0535b22d9mr2709581pls.10.1679824970227; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 03:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 26 Mar 2023 06:02:49 -0400
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <26E410D0-017E-44FC-8FC8-6146F80FF5A3@intel.com>
References: <26E410D0-017E-44FC-8FC8-6146F80FF5A3@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 06:02:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMMESsw2dAqYxZ+U17e_anDvOVKW4NThJvF6AjA1nUGo3=hOiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: secdir <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>, "Smith, Ned" <ned.smith@intel.com>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing@ietf.org>, "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a2a57b05f7caba0f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/3hSH5zLhGA3t_APdTyt0m8MusfU>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-16 secdir review
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:02:54 -0000

Hi Ned!

Once approved, this document will remain in the RFC Editor’s queue until
rfc8736bis is also at the same stage.

The normative reference is on the new header, but also on the registry
updated to allocate the needed bits.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 25, 2023 at 5:54:12 AM, Smith, Ned (ned.smith@intel.com) wrote:

Reviewer: Ned Smith

Review result: Ready



Q: Given [I-D.venaas-pim-rfc8736bis] is a normative reference. Do the
authors expect the ietf-pim-null-register-packing will remain in draft
state until the venaas-pim-rfc8736bis draft is finalized, or is there NOT a
normative dependence on the ‘new common header’?




-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email