Re: [Last-Call] [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-11.txt

Rafa Marin-Lopez <rafa@um.es> Wed, 11 November 2020 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rafa@um.es>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF683A0C8E; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:45:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=um.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQQSkArYi-t5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:45:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx01.puc.rediris.es (outbound4mad.lav.puc.rediris.es [130.206.19.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A083A0BB3; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:45:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xenon42.um.es (xenon42.um.es [155.54.212.169]) by mx01.puc.rediris.es with ESMTP id 0ABIjm5j012181-0ABIjm5k012181; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:48 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon42.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B87209C2; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon42.um.es
Received: from xenon42.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon42.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gzX7_nPeMi0Z; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.40] (73.red-2-138-85.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [2.138.85.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rafa@um.es) by xenon42.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B789208DD; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Rafa Marin-Lopez <rafa@um.es>
Message-Id: <16B6B558-C9ED-4969-AD8C-FC68E94B050A@um.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D36D97A0-FD3E-4AA1-B9E8-3C4FB39FDB56"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 19:45:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20201111053618.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu>
Cc: Rafa Marin-Lopez <rafa@um.es>, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, i2nsf@ietf.org, Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia <fernando.pereniguez@cud.upct.es>, Gabriel Lopez <gabilm@um.es>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
References: <160337357077.29083.9236626834026808055@ietfa.amsl.com> <EE5AB669-73BB-4517-A6F4-23B7807FB36E@um.es> <5F9815D1.9010303@btconnect.com> <DDE550B1-9A9E-4954-B6F9-C0A33ECE1275@um.es> <5F99B221.3040504@btconnect.com> <56155C91-BFE8-4BA9-A55C-46B12E59CD94@um.es> <5F9AF68D.7060105@btconnect.com> <EC88EEFE-5F98-487A-9294-F78B99AC9C47@um.es> <5F9FF661.4080101@btconnect.com> <5FA5439B.40100@btconnect.com> <20201111053618.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-FEAS-SPF: spf-result=pass, ip=155.54.212.169, helo=xenon42.um.es, mailFrom=rafa@um.es
Authentication-Results: mx01.puc.rediris.es; spf=pass (rediris.es: domain of rafa@um.es designates 155.54.212.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rafa@um.es
X-FE-Policy-ID: 2:15:0:SYSTEM, 2:15:1:upct.es
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=um.es; s=DKIM; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:cc:to:references; bh=D11wRNC9RqSItilgkKhCg9cbl08WUCp44KbccFH0bfE=; b=icmOurkrs521mCNl1ntHh4EHzlKTwb/6lOsUDN/xvMG3ao5mO45XcKpYQY2VpVymlNCCcgt1WElz 3PCMIumdsqBSKg4C2QS2gK//UqpJxEpKZprgcSPR5loKaYuHwSl6Zi/jAMo2ZVEnOzcjipmHtWul Myh5VbPsJiEvnvrG8iIENYs8IxwPXvzUCfgAoyLVWdTXUmhab/U5zdw/+aBEKmozj7kDPlsmlkwG hbWqpF7ZlqiaJmJb/AWi607EdIDjVmGEh0gZPZ1kbO10kHAxbUXPE0aPoMSyR3EDvR4V2p9YUu0a 1iQh38Nd4Ni4xmQXBhuCVdSA54HQV/p9YVYNhQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/8vMaqKCL62fVZOvIjjAgA6wTlGw>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-11.txt
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:45:56 -0000

Hi Benjamin (and Tom)

Thanks for this discussion. We can wait for the proper reference.

We would like to mention we are also working in your review, and preparing the e-mail with our response.  In this sense, thank you so much for your very detailed review. It is really valuable.

Best Regards.

> El 11 nov 2020, a las 6:36, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> escribió:
> 
> Hi Tom, Rafa,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 12:37:47PM +0000, tom petch wrote:
>> Rafa
>> 
>> My attempt to read the text keeps running into a brick wall (lockdown:-( 
>> but I have a few new comments.  I said sometime ago that the IESG would 
>> likely find plenty to say and I see that Benjamin has lived up to my 
>> expectations.  I wish I could be as productive as him:-(
>> 
>> For completeness, I include what I have found so far but suspect that 
>> they will all be overtaken by IESG comments.
>> 
>> RFC2247 I don't find good for DN; I find RFC4519 better but suspect that 
>> X.520 would be better still but do not have a copy of that to hand; this 
>> is the sort of thing I expect the IESG to have definite views on
> 
> I agree that 2247 is not very good for DN (but I missed that in my own
> review; thank you for noticing it!).
> I think that the best reference might differ if we want the conventional
> string encoding of the DN vs the actual ASN.1 structure, but I think I
> would have to consult with some other experts to be certain of the right
> reference, in either case.
> 
> -Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org <mailto:I2nsf@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>
-------------------------------------------------------
Rafa Marin-Lopez, PhD
Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC)
Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia
30100 Murcia - Spain
Telf: +34868888501 Fax: +34868884151 e-mail: rafa@um.es
-------------------------------------------------------