IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 March 2022 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A813A133E for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:12:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VU9Xoj_d-A8p for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:12:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FD63A1335 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 08:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id e22so9203790ioe.11 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:12:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bPHc1OkAWN1xM/4LLlGMt1kkWMLUMD8ly5e0RAXTMlo=; b=GvED2VKHi5K+YDBKKJoeEYtzhdDMrEoBXWqGV06ZoJMAW+kQc/x86VL8I3TKPFL1Dd PixqUJ+ecymfje4XbYj8VdZp5FH5vHnQnt6fs0yAi8hSrOVBdxunqp4sJ6XEFul9K6lu uba1x8hVFKot4X44upilCH+071DNKaBTkx2wIY3GK60cIDRiCvktXwCVsUwjYADSmtGd BbgitkXwQXT53wyJYRfqh68OAgh7kGoDEnwp6eAizPjN1F01qjpZwqu/u7PwOZVpelJl Cc0m/5sclNhv6mSbx5Nfv2+kalF39KZV5AA4FAn99aHtFyHDIYeeXfXTEOQkSBUW+Ipr jLxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bPHc1OkAWN1xM/4LLlGMt1kkWMLUMD8ly5e0RAXTMlo=; b=P9GYXjYoksER7kCrrhEaI0bna86vwRXFeiLXTi59E8svPdCdU1OYMM2ccAIuOTYUcm 53y7voDk0tftBHU0121WpEAMXAS5CI2GS25oMY2FTYhEdcPsaQZ2RLCZIBKbleotoDlE p6QiUWdji31OdxV/PPfw3rDIfDAtkYa0zygtppuzFqcTg4t/sEnhSDk9KScQ9pnfxQn5 SHfJR6MD+aIKURGd06Wi6PugILQigHk/IvNFCy93gYTqlarhmVljBg+COE27qZgCyqyQ aeUwTaWumOwA47s5FjcElRFYoVewc4RdU1L5bFe+DqYrYetqJwr/z9OCHALben7rXGkB zEGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UEbQm5/jOtobh/nPcQAZMA716NMySyT+uDNCcTZ2qXLfpYwUr 60PrH5m0+hpyovWJwWr6RlJC9eaWnINWi9OjAas=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqKdJQGcwX1dlxzIb549l4Px8vhqbVwpqXQpO8tTQN5vytAIjJI7vzQbvP+gI4OMDblOkiWd1yqeW/mkB4Pzk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:13cc:b0:317:d7e6:a2b3 with SMTP id i12-20020a05663813cc00b00317d7e6a2b3mr3643141jaj.41.1646755934097; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:12:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220228222932.825F33844270@ary.qy> <245C65D2-EC38-4C49-9CA0-3DD687CB37DA@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMAnmoJ0n3mPscZvc6kbyOZjQU78vb+iA0Pw5Qq=_kKZEw@mail.gmail.com> <57BC7375-B52A-4499-91DE-4D3D5F8D755B@mnot.net> <CA+9kkMCnzONXQGOyrErtFPu01j3LTiOiOdFKMQG1GnceqVYR1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCnzONXQGOyrErtFPu01j3LTiOiOdFKMQG1GnceqVYR1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:11:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAZ1_6J9BxQ+__sf6SQP791+r-YThBns77tfxLFaMpvBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007bda9205d9b73e9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/BaRJc7N_HT2lOZ6JO5PGpAQSj2I>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-koster-rep-06.txt> (Robots Exclusion Protocol) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 16:12:17 -0000

It was rapidly pointed out to me that my statement here:

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:04 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 0) I still believe that removing the no-derivatives clause is the most
>> straightforward to do so. TCP, QUIC, HTTP, and many other Internet
>> specifications remain stable and backwards compatible without the benefit
>> of a no-derivatives clause; I don't see how robots.txt is different.
>>
>> TCP, QUIC, HTTP and many others are developed within the context of the
> IETF.  This has not historically been developed here, and so I believe that
> these are not the strong parallels you see.
>
>
was inappropriately vague about the meaning of "are developed".  I meant
"continued work on these is within the context of the IETF."  I apologize
for any lack of clarity.

regards,

Ted

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email