Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 25 October 2022 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA9CC1522B6; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZZQyC2Z9EOF; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71ADC14CE31; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MxdfC5ZDjz28f; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:07:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1666717635; bh=EV1R9FNIiGSOew1EoA75rfQ0mukkPh2Lo+5a2TpkRGg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=CzuLs7+6SA3vapfVfZbtV7N1c9+so3G1TAMjhJ0d5/fRVHpKql37Gcr+FwKPrWG8G VbUjTdCKhnn+l4+77x/l++SQeByT/K+AJGrh3t7PbGghLK1VGkSX0gB3mm0wx+xRTS oAyrZu68wLneLCzliwjROyRUo2N7b8CSja0Ol6N4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlbEe-2firCI; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 19:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [193.110.157.208]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 112383FC6DE; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:07:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:07:11 -0400
Message-Id: <5C89E6B9-02CC-4318-A6B3-BCEC64B3A8E1@nohats.ca>
References: <1659579803.1584473.1666713109917@email.ionos.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1659579803.1584473.1666713109917@email.ionos.com>
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G82)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/C0yqjpGC0ZweKHBvBYSUWsAnV70>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 17:07:22 -0000

On Oct 25, 2022, at 12:05, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 10/25/2022 9:34 AM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
>>> interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
>>> suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the IETF.
>> 
>> It is a mistake that we will correct.
>> 
> 
> 
> Since it's a list we are all on, I would like to suggest an alternative name.  How about Master-list?

I consider this email inappropriate and unprofessional. It was a follow up to another one of your emails that as similarly inappropriate and unprofessional.

Additionally, you keep misusing the last-call list for off-topic messages.

I ask that the moderators evaluate these messages.

Paul