Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

[Timothy Mcsweeney <[e-mail]>]

> On 10/03/2022 5:27 PM EDT Keith Moore <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>  
> Some people (including myself) may wish to take due 
> care in formally responding, to make sure they've patiently tried to 
> evaluate all of the information presented in support of the proposed action.
> 


It's good to have _ALL_ the information.  For example, some may be surprised to find out that this IESG action has not propery followed BCP 83.  You will notice that in section 2 [1] the #2 bullet says:

2.  it is published as an IESG last call on the IETF general
       discussion list;

And the IETF general discussion list seen here [2] to be: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

And this action was posted on a different list making this action void.  But please be on guard, it is entirey probable that Ted Hardie could make a "Tiny Update to BCP 83" to "fix" this issue. 


[1]  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3683.html#section-2
[2] 
 https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/#:~:text=General%20IETF%20discussion%20list,no%20dedicated%20mailing%20lists%20exist.