Re: [Last-Call] [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-19.txt> (DHCPv6 Options for Home Network Naming Authority) to Proposed Standard

Just published version 20 with the sentence being removed.

Thanks for the feedback!
Yours,
Daniel

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:14 PM Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, removing entire sentence is what I had in mind.
>
> - Bernie Volz
>
> On Sep 20, 2022, at 9:51 PM, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback Bernie, the sentence mentioning the reference is
> the one below in the security consideration.
>
> The link between the HNA and the DHCPv6 server may benefit from additional
> security for example by using {{?I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6}}.
>
> I think the example was illustrative on how the link security can be
> improved. Now I also agree that referring a dead idea is not so ideal. My
> questions are: do we have more valuable examples to cite and if not 2)
> don't you think we should remove the sentence completely ? - I suspect
> simply removing the reference creates a sort of Lapalissade.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:50 PM Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I would highly recommend dropping the text/reference to:
>>
>> [I-D.ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6]
>>               Li, L., Jiang, S., Cui, Y., Jinmei, T., Lemon, T., and D.
>>               Zhang, "Secure DHCPv6", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
>>               draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-21, 21 February 2017,
>>               <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dhc-
>>               sedhcpv6-21.txt>.
>>
>>
>> As that work was long ago abandoned by the DHC wg and it serves no
>> purpose to reference dead work.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - Bernie Volz
>>
>> On 20/09/2022, 17:43, "iesg-secretary@ietf.org on behalf of The IESG" <
>> iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>    The IESG has received a request from the Home Networking WG (homenet)
>> to
>>    consider the following document: - 'DHCPv6 Options for Home Network
>> Naming
>>    Authority'
>>      <draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-19.txt> as
>> Proposed
>>      Standard
>>
>>    The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final
>>    comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>>    last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2022-10-04. Exceptionally,
>> comments may
>>    be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning
>>    of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>>    Abstract
>>
>>
>>       This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority
>>       (HNA) can automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and
>>       outsource the authoritative naming service for the home network.  In
>>       most cases, the outsourcing mechanism is transparent for the end
>>       user.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    The file can be obtained via
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/
>>
>>
>>
>>    No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
>
>

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson