Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

[John C Klensin <[e-mail]>]

--On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 09:02 +1300 Brian E Carpenter
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> Keith, you wrote:
> 
>> Whether or not it's warranted, it's clearly a personal attack
>> on Dan.
> 
> No. It's directed very explicitly at a particular pattern of
> behaviour on some specific mailing lists. It doesn't say that
> he may no longer contribute, say, to Security Area activities.

Brian, while I agree about the "pattern of behavior" my
understanding of the BCP, Marshall's intent at the time, and
what we have done since, Dan (or anyone else similarly
sanctioned) could participate on other mailing lists and in
other activities but only as long as the maintainers of those
lists felt his behavior was appropriate to their work and either
represented a change of behavior from the behaviors cited in the
PR-action proposal.   If they concluded they were seeing the
same patterns of disruption-causing behavior that caused the
PR-action for the IETF list and other lists, they could ban him
there too and do so without further warnings, etc.

    john