IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 25 January 2020 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094D51200D8; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:03:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kTHy-T-R0zLo; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 035F712001B; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id n9so1957041pff.13; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:03:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fPUWXxe6m1B4MBDn6KsQDrjFd1Cr1hs6itWej75w09A=; b=mdHvt/2FjZg45X69VO5Lp/lWf7oYNt24XwMkdBH+Qb2bm+EuKF3A+KrWDsH2/Fhhul zQwv9z8ZystqNdbEb+dxx+8VNsFLN/Y9tAgSoF/XjOKpFqgPVuhMouiYKEqHWKPTh35N Mu7G4TQcOzoGtfrcjcR/vEcV4yhHQzEpoJXDnC/AmucykUpHOoYRHCWuZlt8LZfssV4t FNkVMYzYea0MTuT63cJt24LtRBMK3tEczNDr3qaUWb95frC6n0C1LyIlWaI2XIXyTHbf 10D9lQyqS91Emfos/3tv4jC3GujyqEu4Itcvy6yPU+RhHXrRjmWW5HAKmXXSSsFA4ojh rlHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fPUWXxe6m1B4MBDn6KsQDrjFd1Cr1hs6itWej75w09A=; b=bbx5gJTSXa2ITfBzA4puDVXwsVo3lXYy2K21v1v7CHnEVGsmynFue0ci3DmgO+9Ksz pQoDLW6xMu1Tqwv32wEXyOMOB5WDoODjH7bPHbp285Ra3yCGfAjPL/YcWbFzfJ9m2gtx yi8RnUeC2rSCzZXyauwAebX5P68wn1oWBZlS65JFsEa1aj2xQ+9FbL8sdKeD52F/bFnw A9opbtqonp9Sn5m3F1Z3qc0RYj9AcN51Ewb0XV0NFQDuaYS6xvZZ71B9t7EGjcBx5Pco U7N+3jCPryqzB6ujQHHiRAqAbXtaNvgzZPV2g+i532OEPzmC5+hOVkrCVGT2cI4TOBL5 ksOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUIlr/gOTa8FZC1qNqDPZSwGKcC6m8Ke3XVu2exQmrOaWKCUO8r UBT7v4PaIg/P4i6oUq/79gSMsRGU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUvO8lW+sxwDGI6wKrTMdVdr2yCpPXz22bbilp/n4goJ0VnIriR0pwd3GbE8nOCGNI4XHfpQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:66da:: with SMTP id c26mr7452119pgw.354.1579917815233; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (88.161.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.161.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w5sm7597476pjt.32.2020.01.24.18.03.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:03:34 -0800 (PST)
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6Sy5-ejdjw5zgZgiF1hSyuiAErmas-dbWFmx1b+1vftT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOMVYpEYaEUzYsa0ApDfGtA6oD5P67A40=HQVBN+yTuKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz7vihWaoeG8H11JzQ5YqrbYLPLneuY3PD4syMYEaKQ4w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMeuPQnUtOvxxscN2Si+s5ntx11RE-fRQararL+ePmDXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <34c2fd47-40b4-2126-98b1-b530b5215808@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 15:03:29 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMeuPQnUtOvxxscN2Si+s5ntx11RE-fRQararL+ePmDXA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/DeQZJXFrVFlXvEdYJEh_mS0lnDk>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02.txt> (IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 02:03:38 -0000

On 25-Jan-20 14:48, Eric Rescorla wrote:
...
>>     However, there are a bunch of ways for the IESG to block publication of IRTF or Independent Stream documents given in RFC 5742.
> 
> 
> This seems off topic for this document, which, as noted above, only refers to the IETF stream.

Also it's inaccurate. The IESG has no blocking power. The most the IESG can do is request the Independent Stream Editor not to publish a draft, or to request them to insert a specific IESG note, but the ISE has the final say. Similarly for IRTF drafts, where authority lies with the IRSG.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email