[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04

Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 21 September 2022 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00EC152570; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs.all@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <166380060147.12969.9531587454280474028@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:50:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/EE9jmfY89odvplmOweqIw3p4JWI>
Subject: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 22:50:01 -0000

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Almost Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2022-09-21
IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-04
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Assuming a reasonable answer to one question, this document is ready
for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.

Major issues:
    The one question I have is "why?"  I could not find anywhere in the
    document any explanation of why we are defining an SNMP MIB for monitoring
    ipsecme, nor the equivalent why an operator would choose to use this MIB
    instead of the YANG based model that it is based upon.

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments: N/A